• English

    Google Translate Disclaimer

    The Maryland Department of Information Technology (“DoIT”) offers translations of the content through Google Translate. Because Google Translate is an external website, DoIT does not control the quality or accuracy of translated content. All DoIT content is filtered through Google Translate which may result in unexpected and unpredictable degradation of portions of text, images and the general appearance on translated pages. Google Translate may maintain unique privacy and use policies. These policies are not controlled by DoIT and are not associated with DoIT’s privacy and use policies. After selecting a translation option, users will be notified that they are leaving DoIT’s website. Users should consult the original English content on DoIT’s website if there are any questions about the translated content.

    DoIT uses Google Translate to provide language translations of its content. Google Translate is a free, automated service that relies on data and technology to provide its translations. The Google Translate feature is provided for informational purposes only. Translations cannot be guaranteed as exact or without the inclusion of incorrect or inappropriate language. Google Translate is a third-party service and site users will be leaving DoIT to utilize translated content. As such, DoIT does not guarantee and does not accept responsibility for, the accuracy, reliability, or performance of this service nor the limitations provided by this service, such as the inability to translate specific files like PDFs and graphics (e.g. .jpgs, .gifs, etc.).

    DoIT provides Google Translate as an online tool for its users, but DoIT does not directly endorse the website or imply that it is the only solution available to users. All site visitors may choose to use alternate tools for their translation needs. Any individuals or parties that use DoIT content in translated form, whether by Google Translate or by any other translation services, do so at their own risk. DoIT is not liable for any loss or damages arising out of, or issues related to, the use of or reliance on translated content. DoIT assumes no liability for any site visitor’s activities in connection with use of the Google Translate functionality or content.

    The Google Translate service is a means by which DoIT offers translations of content and is meant solely for the convenience of non-English speaking users of the website. The translated content is provided directly and dynamically by Google; DoIT has no direct control over the translated content as it appears using this tool. Therefore, in all contexts, the English content, as directly provided by DoIT is to be held authoritative.


    Recent Board Policy Clarification regarding Personal Patient Relationships

    It is incumbent on every licensee and registrant to avoid boundary violations involving intimate or romantic or fiduciary relations with individuals while the latter are patients/clients. Both the chiropractic and massage professions regulations prohibit such conduct. Occasionally, licensees/registrants seek a clarification on when it is appropriate to date or develop a personal relationship with an individual after the professional status ends. The following is offered as clarification to this issue.

    MD Code Ann. Health General Section 1-212 establishes guidelines regarding relationships with a patient. Under this section, no personal relationship is authorized while an individual is in an active patient/client status.

    Situations where a relationship initially arises after the patient status ends: Once official patient/lient status ends, the licensee/registrant is free to develop a personal relationship with the former patient or client. The practitioner must insure that healthcare services have officially ended and not resumed before a personal relationship begins.

    Situations where a relationship arises during patient status: If the practitioner believes that he/she and the patient are developing a personal relationship, the practitioner is advised to counsel the patient, terminate the relationship; and document the termination.

    Significantly, every set of circumstances is different. Accordingly, even if the patient status terminates, the practitioner may wish to engage in a “cooling off period” to avoid the appearance of a perceived conflict of interest or boundary violation. The length of such a period should be prudently determined by the practitioner to avoid any appearance to a 3rd party of conflict or violation. If in doubt, impose a lengthier period.