[newsclippings/dhmh_header.htm]
Visitors to Date

Office of Public Relations

 
 
 
DHMH Daily News Clippings
Sunday, April 12, 2009

 

Maryland / Regional
Homeless shelter gets Annapolis appeals OK (Baltimore Sun)
Health care group expo sponsor (Cumberland Times-News)
 
National / International
America's uninsured haven't shown collective power (Washington Post)
 
Opinion
---
 

 
Maryland / Regional
 
Homeless shelter gets Annapolis appeals OK
Panel rejects claim that plan barred by city code
 
By Tyeesha Dixon
Baltimore Sun
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
The Annapolis Board of Appeals has upheld a Department of Planning and Zoning decision to allow a homeless shelter to be built on Hudson Street, despite contention from a local businessman who said the shelter does not conform to the city zoning code at the proposed building site.
 
Michael Roblyer, who has a law firm on Willow Street near the proposed shelter site, filed an appeal in February that the Light House Homeless Prevention Support Center, which is scheduled to start construction this summer at 10 Hudson St., could not be built in a BCE, or business corridor enhancement, zone because of the way certain terms are defined in the city code.
 
The Light House shelter, run by Annapolis Area Ministries Inc., stands on West Street and is the only facility of its kind in the city. The new building would include 500 beds, according to floor plans presented by the project's architect, and would include office space on the first floor, with dormitory and apartment-style living spaces on the second and third floors.
 
The project's supporters, however, argued that the way the new shelter would be built conforms with city code and that Planning and Zoning Director John Arason's January decision to allow the shelter in the zoning district was the correct one.
 
The crux of Roblyer's argument was that the floor plans of the new building, which differ from those of the current shelter, do not fit under definitions of allowed uses under the city code.
 
Right now, city code in that zoning district allows buildings with nonresidential use on the first floor, and residential occupancy on second and third floors - a business on the first floor and apartments on the subsequent floors, for example.
 
Roblyer argued that even though the new shelter would have residential occupancy on the second and third floors, they would not be considered "dwelling units" as defined by the code. He called the project a "bifurcation of one use," noting that all floors of the shelter work in conjunction with each other, despite the separation of the office and living spaces.
 
"The city already decided where a homeless shelter fits in the zoning code," Roblyer told the board, citing a 1990 zoning decision that allowed the shelter to be built at its current West Street location.
 
Arason said the code allows for interpretation, and that when he made his decision, he did not read the code in that manner.
 
At Tuesday night's hearing, Roblyer said, "It was with reluctance" that he decided to file the appeal.
 
"The question before the board is not whether the homeless need to be helped. … The question before the board is whether the particular permitted use … was the proper decision, and is it reasonable under the totality of the circumstances in this case."
 
But several business owners on Willow Street, including Roblyer, fear the shelter will decrease their properties' value.
 
The shelter would be built partially in the city (Hudson Street) and partially in the county (Willow Street).
 
"It's just our opinion that property values will go down surrounding the homeless shelter," Roblyer said.
 
Bonnie Davis, who lives on Willow Street, next to where the shelter is to be built, testified against the project at the hearing.
 
"They talk about being good neighbors, but I've never met any of them," Davis said.
 
"I know it's morally right to take care of our homeless, but is it right to shove the rules aside to do good?"
 
Elizabeth Kinney, chairwoman of the capital campaign for the new shelter, said the building will raise property value in the community.
 
"We intend to be extraordinary neighbors," Kinney told the board.
 
Harry Cole, executive director of Light House, said the building will not attract lines of people outside, nor will it draw unscrupulous crowds.
 
"We're going to have the most beautiful building on the block," Cole said.
 
"The people that we serve go to work, then they come home. … They're not there hanging out."
 
The appeal was one of several hurdles the project has had to overcome. Earlier this year, some city council members opposed giving tax breaks for the project, pointing to a poor economy and much-needed revenue. The council ultimately decided to grant a portion of the breaks requested.
 
Cole said the poor economy has been by far the biggest obstacle facing the project.
 
"We're doing OK when you compare us to most nonprofits," he said. "But it definitely has had an effect on our ability to raise the income that we need."
 
As for the appeals decision, the board will issue a written opinion in 60 days.
 
"I feel very happy and gratified that we got a favorable decision and that we can keep moving forward with offering more services with our clients," Cole said.
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
Health care group expo sponsor
 
Cumberland Times-News
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
CUMBERLAND — Allegany HealthCare Group, the newly formed local company recently chosen as the successful bidder to purchase the Allegany County Nursing Home, has signed on to become a presenting sponsor for the Wellness Expo for the area’s first marathon festival.
 
Scheduled for Sunday on the Canal Place Festival Grounds, the expo will be a daylong effort to promote healthful lifestyles and wellness before and after the Mountain Maryland Marathon presented by Life Fitness Management.
 
A portion of the proceeds from the marathon and all entry fees from the 5K for United Way will benefit the Allegany County United Way. To date, 352 entries from 14 states have been received for four scheduled running events: the marathon, half marathon, 5K for United Way and kids’ marathon. A free 400-meter tot trot will also be held, with registration on race day.
 
Allegany HealthCare joins Rehab First as presenting sponsors of the expo.
 
Other major event sponsors include Life Fitness Management, GO106 radio, Allegany County Department of Tourism, LaVale Veterinary Hospital, Community Trust Foundation, Western Maryland Health System and the PharmaCare Network.
 
Members of the new nursing home operating group shared that the event’s goals of wellness education and increasing awareness of the benefit of fitness attracted them to offer a sponsorship commitment prior to assuming an operating role at the facility in July.
 
“Being a partner in the effort to provide better health care in Allegany County was a goal we shared with the commissioners from the beginning of our bid to operate the nursing home,” Allegany HealthCare partner Bill Freas said.
 
Freas said that Allegany HealthCare became aware of the Wellness Expo and marathon through the commitment of Rehab First and its managing partner, Rob Boyle.
 
“We believe that a healthier community requires a commitment to the continuum of care from childhood to old age,” Allegany HealthCare partner Scott Rifkin said. “So it made total sense for us to provide some support to the energetic new Mountain Maryland Marathon Club, the United Way and other event sponsors who are reaching out to all age groups with a message that promotes healthier lifestyles.”
 
Local nonprofit organizations or agencies that are interested in presenting wellness, nutrition or other health-related services at a table during the Wellness Expo should contact Lucas Owens at Life Fitness Management at (301) 729-2275.
 
Several free table spaces are still available.
 
Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.

 
National / International
 
America's uninsured haven't shown collective power
 
Associated Press
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
Washington Post
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
WASHINGTON -- If the uninsured were a political lobbying group, they'd have more members than AARP. The National Mall couldn't hold them if they decided to march on Washington.
 
But going without health insurance is still seen as a personal issue, a misfortune for many and a choice for some. People who lose coverage often struggle alone instead of turning their frustration into political action.
 
Illegal immigrants rallied in Washington during past immigration debates, but the uninsured linger in the background as Congress struggles with a health care overhaul that seems to have the best odds in years of passing.
 
That isolation could have profound repercussions.
 
Lawmakers already face tough choices to come up with the hundreds of billions it would cost to guarantee coverage for all. The lack of a vocal constituency won't help. Congress might decide to cover the uninsured slowly, in stages.
 
The uninsured "do not provide political benefit for the aid you give them," said Robert Blendon, a professor of health policy and political analysis at the Harvard School of Public Health. "That's one of the dilemmas in getting all this money. If I'm in Congress, and I help out farmers, they'll help me out politically. But if I help out the uninsured, they are not likely to help members of Congress get re-elected."
 
The number of uninsured has grown to an estimated 50 million people because of the recession. Even so, advocates in the halls of Congress are rarely the uninsured themselves. The most visible are groups that represent people who have insurance, usually union members and older people. In the last election, only 10 percent of registered voters said they were uninsured.
 
The grass-roots group Health Care for America Now plans to bring as many as 15,000 people to Washington this year to lobby Congress for guaranteed coverage. Campaign director Richard Kirsch expects most to have health insurance.
 
"We would never want to organize the uninsured by themselves because Americans see the problem as affordability, and that is the key thing," he said.
 
Besides, added Kirsch, the uninsured are too busy scrambling to make ends meet. Many are self-employed; others are holding two or three part-time jobs. "They may not have a lot of time to be activists," he said.
 
Vicki and Lyle White of Summerfield, Fla., know about such predicaments. They lost their health insurance because Lyle had to retire early after a heart attack left him unable to do his job as a custodian at Disney World. Vicki, 60, sells real estate. Her income has plunged due to the housing collapse.
 
"We didn't realize that after he had the heart attack no one would want to insure him," said Vicki. The one bright spot is that Lyle, 64, has qualified for Medicare disability benefits and expects to be getting his card in July.
 
But for now, the Whites have to pay out of pocket for Lyle's visits to the cardiologist and his medications. The bills came to about $5,000 last year. That put a strain on their limited budget because they are still making payments on their house and car.
 
"I never thought when we got to this age that we would be in such a mess," said Vicki, who has been married to Lyle for 43 years. "We didn't think we would have a heart attack and it would change our life forever."
 
While her own health is "pretty good," Vicki said she suffers chronic sinus infections and hasn't had a checkup since 2007. "I have just learned to live with it," she said.
 
The Whites' example shows how the lack of guaranteed health care access undermines middle-class families and puts them at risk, but that many of the uninsured eventually do find coverage. Lyle White has qualified for Medicare, even if the couple must still find a plan for Vicki.
 
Research shows that nearly half of those who lose coverage find other health insurance in four months or less. That may be another reason the uninsured have not organized an advocacy group. At least until this recession, many have been able to fix the situation themselves.
 
"The uninsured are a moving target," said Cathy Schoen, a vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, a research group that studies the problems of health care costs and coverage.
 
But even if gaps in coverage are only temporary, they can be dangerous. "Whenever you are uninsured, you are at risk," said Schoen. "People don't plan very well when they are going to get sick or injured."
 
Indeed, the Institute of Medicine, which provides scientific advice to the government, has found that a lack of health insurance increases the chances of bad outcomes for people with a range of common ailments, from diabetes and high blood pressure to cancer and stroke. Uninsured patients don't get needed follow-up care, skip taking prescription medicines and put off seeking help when they develop new symptoms.
 
Such evidence strengthens the case for getting everybody covered right away, Schoen said. But she acknowledges the politics may get tough. "It certainly has been a concern out of our history that unorganized voices aren't heard," she said.
 
On the Net:
White House:http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/health_care/
 
Health Care for America Now:http://www.healthcareforamericanow.org/
 
Commonwealth Fund:http://www.commonwealthfund.org/
 
Institute of Medicine:http://tinyurl.com/dm8gnn
 
© 2009 The Associated Press.

 
Opinion
--
 

 
State can't stop global warming
 
Baltimore Sun Letter to the Editor
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
Once again The Baltimore Sun congratulates Gov. Martin O'Malley for supporting a bill that seeks to arbitrarily reduce Maryland greenhouse gases by 25 percent by the year 2020 ("Turning green," editorial, April 5).
 
I suppose that sounds like friendly legislation to anyone who believes emission limits on the people of Maryland will make any difference in the alleged climate change of planet Earth. But in fact, legislation like this simply asks the people of Maryland to take on all the pain for absolutely no gain.
 
Even if you believe in the idea of global warming, it is obviously a global issue, not a local issue.
 
What matters are not just the emissions from Maryland but emissions worldwide. And, according to data from the Global Carbon Project, from 2000 to 2007, total greenhouse gas emissions worldwide increased 26 percent.
 
During that period, China's carbon emissions increased 98 percent, India's 3 percent and Russia's 10 percent. U.S. emissions increased only 3 percent.
 
Because of such emission increases in the developing world, unilateral actions by the United States will have little or no affect on the global climate.
 
And actions taken by the state would have absolutely no affect.
 
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the economic consequences of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which could be large and very negative.
 
My suggestion is that whenever someone claims that Maryland must take action with respect to climate change, the common sense questions that the people of Maryland should ask themselves are: "How much will these actions by Maryland change the temperature on the Earth?" and "What cost, in treasure and jobs, would be acceptable for that achievement - and who, exactly, is being asked to pay?"
 
Joel Rosenberg
Ellicott City
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
Reasons abound to reject WTE
 
Frederick News-Post Letter to the Editor
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
I am disappointed to read in The Frederick News-Post of April 8 that only one member of the Board of County Commissioners opposes the so-called waste-to-energy incinerator. FNP pundits notwithstanding, I would have thought that every American would understand the ecological responsibility that we have to reuse (i.e., recycle) primary materials rather than burn them and to resist triggering asthma in the children of 15 schools located within a 5-mile radius of the proposed incinerator site.
 
I was able to stay for only half of two nights' contentious testimony when this proposal came up for public comment before the BoCC. Five parents, themselves asthmatics or parents of asthmatic children, linked the illness in their families to their prenatal proximity to such an incinerator.
 
Apart from the health problems associated with the upper-air release of superheated heavy metals and known carcinogens, the BoCC is actually proposing that we bring in out-of-county engineers and workers to build a half-billion-dollar incinerator that will have to run, at tremendous cost, whether or not it is full.
 
We will be paying off this bond issue for decades -- though the costs have historically run to significant overruns to add to this $500 million total -- regardless of what new technologies are developed to better recycle and commercialize materials that are now being thrown out, or would be burned.
 
This incinerator is being planned even as my neighbors do not benefit from the recycling programs that have been only partially phased in so far in Frederick County. These neighbors, as taxpayers, pay for county recycling despite not being served, in addition to incurring personal expense by visiting recycling centers in their effort to do the environmentally responsible thing -- unlike our BoCC.
 
There is a reason that no so-called WTE incinerator has been built in the last 14 years in the United States -- in the health threat from emissions, in the cost overruns, in the hidden costs written into the contract putting them in business and ourselves in debt for decades, and those factors do not even take into account the overcrowding of our roads that will occur as tons of junk are daily trucked here from Carroll County, the proposed 40 percent partner in this travesty. No energy offset can offset the health costs; the huge, long-term debt; or the start-up costs of this ill-advised project.
 
The BoCC argues that they do not have jurisdiction to legislate recycling, with fines for noncompliance. Funny, the town of Thurmont has mandated recycling for some years now. Are they so much smarter that the rest of the county, or than the BoCC? Shouldn't their model be followed?
 
The answers are several: Fully phase in recycling, as the public has repeatedly requested; fine noncompliance past the 20-30 percent of nonrecyclables; maintain FreeCycle stations for the donation and reuse by others of usable goods that are frequently tossed; ban overpackaging at the commercial source; ban disposable diapers and give tax incentives to diaper services; provide composting facilities at apartments and education for homeowners on how to reduce their organic waste; provide recycle-cans in public places as Europe has done for decades.
 
Some of these measures may be about as popular as a physician-ordered diet, but self-discipline is rarely popular even when urgently needed. Besides, do we want to live with the alternative?
 
Cathy Bodin writes from Emmitsburg.
 
Copyright 2009 Frederick News-Post.

 
Hemp hemp hooray?
 
Frederick News-Post Letter to the Editor
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
To those who are not aware, Reps. Ron Paul and Barney Frank introduced HR 1866 on April 2. This bill, if passed, will amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marijuana, and the state will be left to determine its uses.
 
I'm not going to go into any detail or create any illusions that the U.S. can compete with China, Russia or India in industrial hemp cultivation, or that it will solve all of the world's problems. It may turn out to be another emu or alpaca, or turn into a hideous, state-engulfing weed like kudzu.
 
But this is a chance for people to make their voices heard, in support or opposition. They should write, e-mail,or petition their representatives about this bill in one way or another. Because I'm sick of their complaining.
 
Frank Williams
Brunswick
 
Copyright 2009 Frederick News-Post.

 
America can’t wait another year for health care reform
 
Cumberland Times-News Letter to the Editor
Sunday, April 12, 2009
 
To the Editor:
 
While many in Washington are focused on the economy, the truth is we can’t truly fix our economy without fixing health care.
 
Rising health care costs are hitting those struggling in this economy both families and businesses small and large. The hardest hit are those of us that have had to close our doors after over 20 years in business.
 
If we don’t reform health care now, health care costs are going to continue to skyrocket and insurance premiums could be doubled within 10 years.
 
We simply can’t afford to wait another year for health reform. The cost of doing nothing is too high.
 
Please encourage our politicians to do something now.
 
Marsha Conlin
Rawlings
 
Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.

BACK TO TOP

 

 
 
 

[newsclippings/dhmh_footer.htm]