[newsclippings/dhmh_header.htm]
Visitors to Date

Office of Public Relations

 
 
 
DHMH Daily News Clippings
Saturday, January 24, 2009

 

Maryland / Regional
Private septic systems blamed for water pollution (Baltimore Sun)
Embryonic tests in city possible (Baltimore Sun)
National / International
Infections May Indicate Deadly Bug's Comeback (Washington Post
Opinion
---

 
Maryland / Regional
 
Private septic systems blamed for water pollution
 
Baltimore Sun
Saturday, January 24, 2009
 
Despite public concerns that Anne Arundel County's pumping station overflows are responsible for the Chesapeake waterways' high pollution levels, state and county officials said yesterday that private septic systems are the main source of high bacteria levels. Officials from the Maryland Department of the Environment and Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works spoke to the county's delegation yesterday in Annapolis. Ronald Bowen, director of the county's Department of Public Works, said that pet and septic tank waste have contributed significantly to water pollution. Tyeesha Dixon
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
Embryonic tests in city possible
 
By Matthew Hay Brown and Stephanie Desmon
Baltimore Sun
Saturday, January 24, 2009
 
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has given the go-ahead for a California biotechnology company to inject humans with embryonic stem cells for the first time -- a turning point in the decade-long debate over whether the potential of the cells to heal injuries and cure diseases outweighs the ethical questions raised by their use.
 
Geron Corp. plans to inject up to 10 recently injured paraplegics with the living cells this summer and monitor the patients throughout the year that follows. While the purpose of the study is to determine whether the treatment is safe, investigators also will be looking to see if it works.
 
"Any return of bowel or bladder function, a return of sensation or a return of lower extremity locomotion would be a very exciting finding," Dr. Thomas B. Okarma, Geron's president and chief executive, told reporters yesterday during a conference call to announce the approval. The Menlo Park, Calif., firm, which funded the University of Wisconsin researchers who first isolated embryonic stem cells in 1998, received permission to begin the Phase I safety study from the FDA this week.
 
Newly inaugurated President Barack Obama has pledged to broaden federal support for embryonic stem cell research, but an FDA spokeswoman called the timing of the approval "purely coincidental." Geron submitted its request last year to begin testing the treatment, and is not using federal funds for the trial. Obama has yet to appoint new FDA leadership.
 
Dr. Peter Gorman, a professor of neurology at the University of Maryland, said Maryland Shock Trauma Center and Kernan Hospital are likely to be among the sites at which the trial will be conducted. Gorman said he has been in conversations with Geron for several months, and the company has sent representatives to visit the facilities, both in Baltimore. A spokesman for Geron said the test sites have not been finalized.
 
Dr. Douglas Kerr, a neurologist at Johns Hopkins, called the approval both "very big" and "really important."
 
"I hope it gets us some answers we can then build on," he said.
 
Scientists see embryonic stem cells, which are able to develop into any type of cell found in the human body, as a potential source of replacement tissues that could be used to treat a broad range of maladies, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, leukemia and spinal cord injury.
 
"Embryonic stem cells are really nature's own way of making more of ourselves," Okarma said. "We are simply harnessing the biology of normal human development in our attempts to achieve permanent cure to chronic disease and injury."
 
But harvesting the cells destroys the embryos, and so has drawn opposition from the Roman Catholic Church and others. President George W. Bush twice vetoed legislation that would have broadened federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
 
Obama, who supported broader funding as a member of the Senate, has said he would sign such legislation as president.
 
The Maryland medical community, while enthusiastic about yesterday's announcement, expressed concerns about the planned trial. Kerr questioned the decision to study new injuries, as opposed to chronic spinal cord problems. If patients improve, he said, it will be difficult to know whether it was because of the treatment or if they would have improved on their own.
 
"Part of me worries that this may not be the best first trial," he said. For the first subjects, Kerr would have preferred a group of patients who would not have recovered under conventional treatment -- such as children with spinal muscular atrophy, who usually die before the age of 2.
 
"What Geron has tried to do is set expectations very low -- this is purely a safety study," he said. "A likely outcome is [the embryonic stem cells] will probably be safe ... but we won't have more of an understanding of the biology of what these stem cells can do and their ability to repair in human spinal cord injury."
 
Dr. Curt I. Civin, a stem cell pioneer at Hopkins, says low expectations are appropriate.
 
"What they're really testing in this study is ... can you give these stem cells to people and do they cause any harm?" said Civin, who is to leave Hopkins next month to become director of the new University of Maryland Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. "We should condition ourselves to grit our teeth and hope this is not toxic."
 
Ruth Faden, director of the Berman Institute for Bioethics at Hopkins, expects discussion of the moral and ethical controversies surrounding the use of the cells. But she wants attention paid to the welfare of those who agree to participate in the trial.
 
"We have to be thinking about what's going to be happening to these people," she said.
 
One concern is the safety of the cells being used, which Kerr called "very powerful." The cells in the trial are supposed to behave as nervous system cells, but he said it is possible that "one or two or 10 or 100" could retain the properties of embryonic stem cells -- meaning they could continue to divide and differentiate in ways scientists didn't expect.
 
"They can become anything," Kerr said, "and what if they become the wrong thing?"
 
Okarma said tests involving more than 2,000 animals showed that such differentiation did occur in some, but added that it had "no clinical consequence. ... There's no effect on the animal's life, mortality, and we've shown in separate studies that these cells avoid recognition by the human immune system."
 
The treatment showed benefits in rats, Okarma said. The stem cells reinsulated damaged nerves, leading to "improvement in locomotor activity."
 
"This approach is one that reaches beyond pills and scalpels to achieve a new level of healing," he said. "We hope to achieve the restoration, perhaps permanently, of organ and tissue function by the injection of healthy replacement cells."
 
In the human trial, to be conducted at up to seven medical centers in the United States, patients will be injected in the spine at the site of the injury. They will be given anti-rejection drugs for the first 60 days and will be followed for at least a year.
 
A successful trial could help shift the debate over embryonic stem cells. Opponents have long argued that the potential benefits have never been proved.
 
"Several politicians have said over the years, 'Tell me when this is going to benefit a patient,' and then they'll loosen the restrictions," Civin said. He expressed hope that the trial would help provide an answer.
 
"Whether it's going to be a home run or the single," he said, "I don't know."
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
National / International
 
Infections May Indicate Deadly Bug's Comeback
 
By David Brown
Washington Post
Saturday, January 24, 2009; A06
 
Federal health officials are concerned that a recent uptick in so-called Hib infections in Minnesota infants may signal a comeback of the deadly bacterium as a consequence of a vaccine shortage and the reluctance of some parents to immunize their children.
 
Minnesota recorded five cases of infection by Haemophilus influenzae Type B last year, the highest number since 1992, including three in November and December. The death of a 7-month-old was the first Hib fatality in a child there since 1991.
 
In two cases, parents refused to have their child immunized. In a third, they asked to defer vaccination until the child was 5, long after the shots are usually given.
 
"Parents need to know this disease is still around and that it is very dangerous," Anne Schuchat, head of immunization at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said yesterday.
 
"I can't emphasize how important it is to use this tool in our toolbox," Ruth Lynfield, Minnesota's state epidemiologist, said of the Hib vaccine, normally given at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months of age.
 
Hib can cause several types of infection, all of them potentially fatal. Three of the Minnesota children had meningitis, one had pneumonia and one had epiglottitis, an infection of a structure in the back of the throat.
 
Since the Hib vaccine became widely available in 1990, infections have fallen by 99 percent nationwide. Minnesota used to have 200 to 250 each year in children; now sometimes there are none.
 
The five recent cases occurred independently, suggesting that the microbe is circulating widely in the population and is not just being passed in a high-risk environment such as a day-care center.
 
Whether this is happening elsewhere and has just not been noticed is the major unanswered question.
 
Minnesota traditionally has high vaccination coverage and is not known for having a vocal anti-vaccine community, as is the case in Oregon, Washington state Colorado, among other places. It also has unusually good disease surveillance, which could explain the discovery of the five cases.
 
"We don't know whether this problem is occurring in other states, but we really want to heighten the awareness of this problem," Schuchat said.
 
A relative shortage of Hib vaccine may also be contributing.
 
While two companies make the vaccine in the United States, only one, Sanofi Pasteur, is now supplying the market. The other producer, Merck, recalled its vaccine in December 2007 because of questions about its sterility. The company is not expected to be shipping vaccine again until the middle of this year, a spokeswoman said.
 
Because of the shortage, physicians have been asked to defer the fourth dose of Hib vaccine, the "booster," unless a child is at high risk for infection because of other illnesses.
 
Although theoretically there is enough vaccine to provide the first three shots for all American babies, a Minnesota survey suggests that may not be true everywhere. Infants there were nearly 20 percent less likely to have received their three Hib shots than to have had three shots of another vaccine (for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) given on the same schedule.
 
In addition to the three children who were never vaccinated, one of the Minnesota children received three doses but was found to have an immune-deficiency disease that increased risk. The fifth child had two doses.
 
Lynfield said that overall there appears to be a decline in "herd immunity" to Hib in Minnesota -- the situation in which the few susceptible children are protected by the many immunized ones, who block the microbe from entering the population.
 
The nation last year saw seven outbreaks of measles in the United States and 140 cases, the largest number since 1996. One occurred in a San Diego charter school where about 35 percent of parents signed vaccine exemptions for their children.
 
Vaccine refusal in Britain is now so widespread that measles, once eliminated there, is endemic again.
 
Copyright 2009 Washington Post.

 
Opinion
 
---
 

BACK TO TOP

 

 
 
 

[newsclippings/dhmh_footer.htm]