|
-
|
-
|
-
-
Maryland /
Regional
Hospitals Tally Their Avoidable Mistakes
(Washington Post)
China releases some Md. teens from flu quarantine
(Baltimore Sun)
Howard now leads the state in Lyme disease
(Baltimore Sun)
Reaching out to
city's uninsured
(Baltimore Sun)
O'Malley to cut
agency budgets
(Baltimore Sun)
O'Malley plans cuts to stem cell funding, tourism and
advertising
(Daily Record)
Apartments updated after carbon monoxide illness
(Baltimore Sun)
A camp for
health care wannabes
(Baltimore Sun)
Coxsackieviruses may cause conjunctivitis, herpangina and
hand, foot and mouth disease
(Baltimore Sun)
Judge to
decide if mother was insane
(Annapolis Capital)
Obama's drug chief looks to Baltimore for ideas
(Baltimore Sun)
Md. Doctor's Life Unravels Amid Drug, Assault Charges
(Washington Post)
BWMC
named one of nation's top hospitals
(Annapolis Capital)
National /
International
Drink lots of water to avoid kidney stones (and other
tips!) (Baltimore Sun)
Medical marijuana science, through the smoke
(Baltimore Sun)
Should
schools close for swine flu?
(Baltimore Sun)
Lupus drug passes key test, researchers say
(Baltimore Sun)
Doctor's Orders
(Washington Post)
Health
insurance tips for young adults
(Washington Post)
The Do-It-Yourself
Funeral
(New York Times)
Free clinics hit with more patients, less funding
(Daily Record)
S.C. case looks on child obesity as child abuse. But is it? (USA Today)
Opinion
---
Maryland /
Regional
Hospitals Tally Their Avoidable Mistakes
By Lisa Rein
Washington Post
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Surgery on a patient with a debilitating spinal-cord
disease went terribly wrong in a District hospital last
year: The patient was discharged only to be readmitted a few
days later complaining of severe leg pain. The surgeon, it
turned out, had operated on the wrong part of the spine.
A 44-year-old man who came to the emergency room of a
Maryland hospital with painful swelling in his groin
received a hernia diagnosis from a physician's assistant,
who operated without consulting a physician. Fifteen minutes
later the man went into cardiac arrest and died.
Meanwhile, over the course of the year, patients at one
hospital in Northern Virginia developed life-threatening
blood infections at a rate of 2.1 for every 1,000 times
doctors inserted an IV tube to deliver medication.
These are among the hundreds of incidents of death or
serious medical harm disclosed in the past year by hospitals
in the Washington region, preventable errors that until
recently have not required public reporting. Under laws that
took effect last year in Virginia and a few years earlier in
the District and Maryland, hospitals must report to health
regulators many serious injuries that patients suffer in the
course of treatment.
The laws are different in each jurisdiction. For
example, Virginia's public records identify the hospitals by
name, while Maryland's and the District's do not. But they
all allow the public to glimpse the breadth of mistakes that
health experts dub "never events" (because they should never
happen): sponges left inside patients after surgery,
operations on the wrong limb, medication errors, falls that
lead to needless deaths. At least 20 states require
hospitals to report every incidence of hospital-acquired
infection.
Picking Up Steam
Patients, insurers and regulators are beginning to use
this information to prod health-care providers to ensure
that such events really never happen.
It used to be that if a doctor, nurse or technician was
responsible for injuring you, your insurance company was
billed for the action that caused the injury as well as what
might be needed to treat it. Maryland health regulators
estimate that insurance companies paid $522 million last
year to cover preventable complications in hospitals, which
occurred in 55,000 of the state's 800,000 inpatient cases.
Now, following the lead of Medicare, some other public
and private insurers are starting to refuse payment -- for
example, they won't pay for treatment of urinary tract
infections caused by a catheter. It's on the same theory, as
some put it, that if a lawn service mowed down your rosebush
while cutting the grass, you wouldn't pay the company to
replace it.
This activity is part of a patient safety movement that
is picking up steam across the country, led by patients and
family members who've suffered devastating errors and are
pressing lawmakers to enforce accountability. One of these
is Sorrel King, a Baltimore County woman whose toddler
daughter Josie fell into a tub of scalding water eight years
ago and was rushed to Johns Hopkins Children's Center in
Baltimore with severe burns. The hospital staff missed
mounting symptoms of dehydration her mother had observed.
Josie died after an injection of a narcotic, despite orders
that she receive no further medication.
Johns Hopkins acknowledged a series of errors and
miscommunications and took full responsibility, although
King says the hospital billed her insurance company for
Josie's care.
Though nothing can make up for such a tragedy, King sees
the denial of payment as the most effective way of getting
hospitals to improve their performance.
"I accept that it boils down to money," she said. "It's
unfortunate that it has to come to that. But you need
incentives."
In Maryland, where hospitals have been required for five
years to report errors that led to death and serious harm,
the hospital association made voluntary agreements with
insurance companies last year not to bill for eight medical
errors, including transfusions that use the wrong blood type
and surgery on the wrong side. And starting this month, the
state commission that sets hospital rates is using a new
system that ranks hospitals on how often they commit 52
specific mistakes, from preventable obstetrical
complications to infections of wounds that develop after
surgery. Hospitals that report the most mistakes from that
list will be required to bill insurers at a lower rate,
while those with fewer can charge more; the total amount
spent should remain about the same, but more money will flow
to the hospitals with fewer errors.
"This is an incentive to change behavior and provide
better care," said Stephen Ports, principal deputy director
of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission.
Maryland also requires hospitals to come up with plans
for preventing the reported mistakes from happening again.
And it is instituting rules such as noting any underlying
medical problems on a patient's chart at check-in, so it
will be clear if a new condition arises. If the hospital is
at fault, it will be denied payment for 85 percent of the
cost of care to reverse the error. That 85 percent figure,
Ports said, is an acknowledgment that "nothing is 100
percent preventable."
Fines are also part of the incentive program: Doctors
Community Hospital in Prince George's County was fined
$30,000 this spring after failing to notify regulators of
staff errors that caused one death and serious harm to at
least seven other patients. The hospital also promised to
spend $65,000 on a patient safety program.
Sending a Message
A handful of other Maryland hospitals have received
warnings for delays in reporting and follow-up reviews. The
state Office of Health Care Quality cited Laurel Regional
Medical Center in October, for example, for failing to
submit an analysis of three deaths in 2007 that were caused
by hospital errors: one patient in diabetic shock who died
in the emergency room after a delay in treatment, an
emergency Caesarean section on a 16-year-old girl that
resulted in the baby's death, and the death after a delay in
treatment for a patient's cerebrovascular accident. Laurel
promptly submitted a plan of correction, said Renee B.
Webster, assistant director of the state Office of Health
Care Quality.
In Virginia, which so far is requiring reporting only of
serious infections caused by IV insertions, the state
hospital association is trying to get ahead of the curve: On
behalf of the state's 95 hospitals, it reached a deal last
month not to bill for several errors caused by hospital
staff. "The hope is to send a message that if we make a
mistake, we're going to own up and take the consequences,"
said Katharine Webb, the association's lobbyist.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Virginia's largest
private insurer, has stopped paying hospitals for four
surgical mistakes: when a wrong procedure is done; when the
wrong body part is operated on; when the wrong patient is
operated on, and when a foreign object is left inside the
patient, requiring another incision. "We wanted to raise the
profile of patient safety," said Jay Schukman, regional
president and senior medical director for Anthem Blue Cross
and Blue Shield's East Region.
In the District, which began reporting preventable
errors in 2007, hospitals, clinics and nursing homes
disclosed 529 mistakes from July 2007 through June 2008.
Fourteen led to the death of a patient. The most commonly
reported errors, most of which occurred at hospitals, were
pressure ulcers, retained foreign objects after surgery and
infections from IV tubes. Other mistakes included a patient
who developed an arrhythmia after chest surgery had a
temporary pacing wire inserted into the heart's ventricle
instead of the atrium; doctors improperly put a catheter in
a patient with terminal kidney disease on the same side as
the patient's dialysis shunt, and the catheter had to be
removed. In another case, a surgeon performing a breast
biopsy made an incision to the woman's left breast instead
of the right.
So far, the District has not tried to use financial
incentives to affect the hospitals' behavior.
Patient safety laws like Maryland's are not designed to
be punitive: For hospitals, the real price of mistakes often
comes through the courts, when patients or their families
take legal action. It's too early to tell if the new laws
are reducing errors. Some institutions in Maryland are
reporting more errors, year over year -- but for now,
regulators consider this a good sign of increasingly
accurate reporting rather than a reflection of more
mistakes.
Said Webster: "Just requiring hospitals to have regular
communication with us is invaluable."
Copyright 2009 Washington Post.
China releases some Md. teens from flu quarantine
By John-John Williams IV
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
A group of Maryland teen volleyball players was released
Monday from a quarantined Beijing hotel, where they had been
held after taking the same flight as a person who later
developed illness from the H1N1 virus, also known as swine
flu.
Tarver Shimek, 16, a rising senior at Towson High
School, said she was glad to be able to finish a trip with
fellow travelers from the Maryland Junior Volleyball Club.
As Chinese authorities assessed her health risks, she
spent more than three days in the hotel, she said, making up
games like "hotel tag" with other teenagers. They played
with a volleyball that a coach gave them, and held a fashion
show where all of the costumes were made of surgical masks,
which those who were quarantined were required to wear at
all times. But as some in the hotel started to show flu-like
symptoms, Shimek said she eventually avoided contact as much
as possible.
"It wasn't really possible to have much entertainment
anymore," she said. "So the last couple of days were very
long. I watched a lot of movies. It was quite boring."
China has one of the strictest methods in the world for
limiting the spread of swine flu. Officials in masks or
hazmat suits will board planes with temperature guns that
they point at passengers' foreheads. If a passenger later is
diagnosed with swine flu, anyone seated within three rows of
that person is often tracked down. Those quarantined usually
get to leave if they are well seven days from the date they
landed.
Shimek will be able to wrap up her 12-day trip with a
visit to the Great Wall, and the opportunity to perfect her
volleyball skills by working with top Chinese coaches.
"I'm glad she got out as soon as she did," said Shimek's
mother, Suellen Wideman of Towson. "I'm just focusing on how
much worse it could have been. Tarver remained so positive.
She made lemonade out of lemons. She made friends."
Mother and daughter stayed in contact with a series of
50-cent text messages.
Shimek estimates that there were about 25 Marylanders
from two different groups eventually confined to the hotel.
It was unclear how many were released Monday.
In addition to the junior club, Marylanders from
USA-China Sports & Education Exchange, based in Silver
Spring, were also thought to have been quarantined. The
program attracts volleyball players from throughout the
region, including Maryland and Virginia, said coordinator
Ray Liu. Liu said he could not provide details about the
campers because he was not in his office.
The U.S. Embassy's spokeswoman, Susan Stevenson, told
the Associated Press that she did not have a total number of
Americans quarantined in China, but said they were "aware of
several cases at the moment." About 1,800 Americans have
been quarantined in China since the swine flu measures began
in early May, according to Stevenson. Of those Americans
quarantined, 200 have tested positive for swine flu.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
Howard
now leads the state in Lyme disease
Figures from 2008 show county rise, statewide drop
Columbia Flier
By Heather Carney
Baltimore Sun
Monday, July 20, 2009
Howard County had the highest number of reported cases
of Lyme disease in the state in 2008, according to a recent
report from the Maryland Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene.
There were 369 confirmed and probable cases reported in
Howard County in 2008, according to the report, 11 more
than in 2007.
Montgomery County, which had been tops in the state, was
second to Howard in 2008 with 314 cases, down from 475 the
previous year.
Statewide, the total decreased from 2,576 cases in 2007
to 2,216 in 2008.
No data is available yet on the number of cases reported
in 2009.
Lyme disease is caused by a bacteria transmitted by an
infected tick, according to the state health department. It
is treatable if caught early, but if not treated may cause
chronic symptoms that can include joint pain, heart
palpitations and neurological problems.
Howard County Health Officer Peter Beilenson attributed
the increase here to the county’s growing development.
“We’re developing more in areas that were originally
woodland, decreasing the distance between the forests where
ticks are more prevalent and where people live,” Beilenson
said.
Elizabeth Bohle, director for the county Health
Department’s division of communicable disease, said Lyme
disease is better-reported now because people are much more
informed about the disease.
Since 2006, the number of reported cases in the county
has tripled.
“In the county, we’ve really had it as a priority to
follow up on Lyme disease through education, and devoting
many of our resources to tracking each reported case,” Bohle
said. “We’ve just created a much more heightened awareness
in the clinicians and the public.”
She added that Howard County is a particularly good
breeding environment for Lyme disease because of the high
numbers of deer and white-footed mice, both of which are
carriers of the black-legged tick that transmits the
disease.
Bohle also noted that the county is plentiful in parks,
forests, lakes and other moisture-rich locations, where
ticks flourish.
Beilenson said the best approach to prevention is
educating the public about ticks and teaching people to
check for ticks after they’ve been outside and to remove the
ticks quickly if they find any. He added that in most cases,
a tick must be attached to the skin for 24 hours for the
disease to be transmitted.
“I use the mentality, what would I do if I found a tick
on my child? I would automatically take them to the doctor
to get them checked,” Beilenson said.
The county health department, which held a series of
sessions on Lyme disease in March and April, is planning
another session near the end of August.
Lyme primer:
How Lyme disease is transmitted: Through the bite
of an infected black-legged tick.
Symptoms: From three to 30 days after a tick
bite, a gradually expanding rash occurs at the site of the
bite in three-quarters of infected people. Other symptoms
may include fever, headache and fatigue. If untreated,
symptoms include a loss of muscle tone in the face, severe
headaches and neck stiffness, shooting pains, heart
palpitations, dizziness and joint pains.
How to treat: Most cases are cured with
antibiotics, especially when caught early. See your doctor.
How to prevent: Use insect repellent when
outside, and if possible, wear long sleeves and long pants
tucked into your socks. After being outside in wooded areas,
check yourself, your children and your pets for ticks.
To remove ticks: Using fine-tipped tweezers, grab
the tick close to the skin and gently pull it straight up
until all of the tick is removed. Do not use petroleum
jelly, a hot match, nail polish or other products to remove
ticks.
For more information: Go to edcp.org/vet_med/lyme_disease.html.
Source: Maryland Department of Health & Mental
Hygiene
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.
Reaching out to
city's uninsured
HealthCare teams go to people on stoops, at markets
By Angela Bass
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Baltimore City health officials say full health coverage
is just an application away for nearly half of the city's
100,000 uninsured residents. But a surprising number of them
are not applying.
"Many people just don't know about it," said Kathleen
Westcoat, president and chief executive officer of Baltimore
HealthCare Access Inc., a city health agency connecting
eligible families, singles and kids to seven free or
low-cost managed care plans housed under the Medicaid roof.
The agency enrolled 9,074 residents of its target 10,000
in one of its Medical Assistance for Families programs by
the end of June, not counting those enrolled in its other
programs, for which the agency said it does not have
figures.
Because of the recession, the agency can't always afford
the kind of advertising it needs to attract more applicants.
Using grant money, agency officials adopted an aggressive ad
campaign, with an eye toward Greenmount East, Druid Heights,
Sandtown-Winchester and other neighborhoods that have been
ravaged by preventable diseases and infant mortality, and
whose residents have little to no access to managed care.
Agency officials hired Jeff Rasmussen, owner of
In-Motion Advertising, to add a few "guerrilla marketing
tactics" to its more traditional billboards approach.
Rasmussen said the tactics are meant to "reach people while
they're sitting on their stoop, walking to work and living
their lives," adding that billboards on the sides of
buildings don't mean as much to people from urban areas,
where billboards are everywhere.
"If that's what it takes in this media-saturated society
we live in, then that's what we'll do," Rasmussen said.
"It's my job to get them to this point."
Agency outreach workers reached thousands in the
targeted neighborhoods with informational door hangers
shaped like Band-Aids, inviting people to attend an
insurance enrollment health fair inside Lexington Market
last month. Others saw Rasmussen's canary yellow trucks
flanked by giant scrolling ads roving the busiest blocks of
their community. And some residents simply found the fair
while shopping for groceries, with staffers from radio
station 92Q Jams enticing shoppers with free prizes.
Hospital workers were also on hand, screening for high blood
pressure, diabetes and prostate cancer, among other common
ailments.
"Everyone has to grocery shop," said Therese McIntyre,
the agency's director of communications and legislative
affairs. "We were reaching people who wouldn't necessarily
be in health settings." A second fair was held in the
parking lot of Santoni's Super Market two weeks later.
Charles Lowther, 44, showed up at the Lexington Market
fair after outreach workers he met on the street handed him
one of the door hangers. The Baltimore native was laid off
in October from his job as a lumberyard forklift driver,
leaving him without health coverage and easy access to
treatment for the acid reflux disease he suffers from. He's
training to become a certified mechanic in hopes of getting
a job with benefits. "Honestly, I'm the type that don't like
handouts," said the single father of two daughters in their
20s and an 8-year-old son. "I like to earn what I have."
June marked Lowther's second attempt, however, to apply
for the Primary Adult Care program, which covers
prescriptions, mental health care and dental services.
Enrollment in all programs - including the Medical
Assistance for Families Program and the Maryland Children's
Health Program - is free.
With Lowther's first attempt, he never paid the $12 fee
to obtain a copy of his birth certificate, one of the few
documents agency staffers need to determine eligibility.
For more information on insurance plans and health
fairs, call Baltimore HealthCare Access at 410-649-0500 or
311.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
O'Malley to cut
agency budgets
$300 million is first step; more furloughs possible
By Laura Smitherman
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Gov. Martin O'Malley plans to outline about $300 million
in budget cuts today that will mostly fall on state
agencies. But future rounds of cutbacks could include
furloughs of state employees, officials said.
O'Malley, a Democrat, briefed legislative leaders on his
proposed budget cuts over a two-hour dinner meeting at the
governor's mansion in Annapolis Monday night. The governor
must pare about $700 million from the $14 billion budget for
the fiscal year that began this month because the recession
has caused tax receipts to slump.
The governor will submit some spending cuts for approval
by the Board of Public Works Wednesday, and those will
target health care and higher education programs, lawmakers
said. The balance of budget cuts are expected later this
year.
"We're going to look to state agencies first, and at
some point in time we're going to have to go back to
furloughs," said Sen. President Thomas V. Mike Miller after
emerging from the meeting. He added that state leaders are
mindful of trying to save state employee jobs.
"They're trying to keep people employed," said House
Speaker Michael E. Busch, who also attended the briefing.
"The recession's not their fault."
O'Malley began talks with labor union officials Monday
about the potential impact of budget cuts on state
employees, and he plans to hold discussions with local
leaders before reducing aid to local governments. State
workers were required to take up to five furlough days
earlier this year.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
O'Malley plans cuts to stem cell funding, tourism and
advertising
By Andy Rosen
Daily Record
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Gov. Martin O’Malley said Tuesday he plans to cut
spending on the state’s stem cell program, tourism promotion
and lottery advertising in a proposal he will bring before
the Board of Public Works Wednesday.
The about $281.5 million in cuts will result in 39
worker layoffs throughout various state agencies, and the
elimination of about 18 unfilled positions. They also
contain a $3 million cut to the Stem Cell Research Fund
(leaving $12.4 million), a $1.1 million reduction the
Maryland Tourism Development Board (leaving $4.9 million)
and a $5.5 million reduction in the Maryland State Lottery’s
advertising budget (leaving $11.8 million).
Many of the largest cuts come from the state’s health
care budget, including a $75 million move to use federal
Medicaid money instead of state dollars for some expenses.
The cuts are just the first part of an up to $750
million reduction in spending that O’Malley says he plans
over the course of the year. He plans to bring the rest of
the cuts to the Board of Public Works by early September.
Some of the toughest decisions appear to lie ahead.
O’Malley said he is not submitting all of those cuts now
because he needs more time to negotiate with state workers
and local governments, because the state needs to reduce
spending on worker compensation and local aid. He stopped
short of outlining cuts he is considering in those areas,
and did not say if worker furloughs would be a part of any
new package of cuts.
However, O’Malley did say he is hoping to avoid
widespread layoffs as part of his budget solution.
“We are striving in all of this to avoid the sort of
massive layoffs that contribute to unemployment that we’ve
seen other states have to revert to,” he said. “But having
said that, when there are cases where the efficiency and the
effectiveness of state government call for an elimination,
an abolishment of some jobs, sadly that are already filled,
unfortunately we have to do that.”
More furloughs would add to the up to five days that
about 67,000 state workers have already been told they will
have to take off without pay this year. O’Malley instituted
the furloughs late last year as a measure intended to fill a
budget gap for fiscal 2009.
But though fiscal 2010 began just this month, the state
is already facing a significant gap as revenues fall well
short of expectations. Last week, Comptroller Peter Franchot
said state revenue in June came in 12 percent below 2008
collections. Revenue for the entire fiscal 2009 were down
5.7 percent so far, Franchot said in a report to legislative
leaders, but emphasized that more money will come in before
final numbers are available next week.
Legislative analysts warned this month that the state
budget could be out of balance by $700 million, and likely
more if revenues continue to decline. O’Malley has warned
that budget reductions of that magnitude are certain to be
felt in all areas of state government. Overall, the state’s
General Fund budget this year comes to $13.8 billion.
Copyright 2009 Daily Record.
Apartments updated after carbon monoxide illness
By Nick Madigan
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
In what they called "an abundance of caution," the
owners of a Northeast Baltimore apartment building in which
nine people were sickened by a carbon monoxide leak said
Monday that they would replace water heaters in four of the
complex's 803 units.
Sawyer Realty Holdings LLC issued a statement saying the
Sunday leak at the Dutch Village Townhomes appeared to have
come from a faulty water heater in a vacant unit. The
carbon-monoxide detector in that unit went off and alerted
tenants in a neighboring apartment.
Seven children and two adults were treated at two
medical facilities and "were able to return home," the
statement said.
Hours after that incident, an adult and three children
were taken to a Howard County hospital about 5 a.m. Monday
after another apparent carbon monoxide leak in Columbia.
In that incident, firefighters were unable to locate the
source of the contamination, according to Battalion Chief
Eric Proctor of the Howard County Department of Fire and
Rescue Services. He said the American Red Cross was trying
to find shelter for the family until staff at the apartment
complex on the 10300 block of Twin Rivers Road "figures out
what the problem is."
In the Baltimore incident, firefighters and medics
arrived at the apartment in the 6900 block of McClean
Boulevard, near Perring Parkway, shortly after 3 p.m. and
found seven children and two adults complaining of feeling
ill, said Chief Kevin Cartwright, a spokesman for the
Baltimore Fire Department.
Firefighters and a Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. crew
traced the leaking carbon monoxide to a malfunctioning
gas-operated water heater on the first floor and shut it
down, he said.
Cartwright said low levels of the gas also were found in
two adjacent, vacant apartments.
The owners of the apartment complex, built in 1953, also
own Cove Village in Essex, which has a history of carbon
monoxide problems, including two incidents that sent eight
people to the hospital last month. In July 2005, three
people - a 48-year-old man and his two stepdaughters, ages
14 and 15 - died after inhaling the gas in their home at
Cove Village.
A Sawyer Realty spokesman said Monday in an e-mail that
the company had spent more than $2 million on renovations at
the Dutch Village Townhomes complex. Most of the work was
done in 2004, according to the property's Web site. All the
units have carbon-monoxide detectors, the company says.
Sawyer Realty's statement said that fire department
officials did not detect "any immediate health hazards" in
tests at adjoining units. However, just to be safe, the
company said, water heaters in two occupied units were
replaced Sunday night and the heaters in two vacant units -
including the one in which the problem arose - were to be
replaced on Monday.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
A camp for health
care wannabes
At this camp, teens learn the daily lives of health
professionals
By Angela J. Bass
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Ashley Jones was set on becoming a professional soccer
player. But by the end of a local summer health camp for
teens, she was chasing a career in nursing.
Jones, now 21, participated in the first annual Camp
ECHO (Exploring Careers in Healthcare Organization), a
five-day summer immersion program - now in its sixth year at
St. Agnes Hospital - that exposes state high school students
to the many sides of the health care professions.
Participants - seven girls this year - spend five hours
a day peeking in on surgeries in the operating room,
training for adult and child CPR certification or shadowing
physicians and nurses, dieticians and radiologists, and
other staff.
Jones, who is one year shy of earning her bachelor's
degree in community health from Hofstra University on Long
Island, N.Y., liked the camp so much she is back to help
while she is interning this summer in St. Agnes'
administrative department. "I'd always thought about being a
nurse, helping people and giving back to the community," she
said "This program sealed it for me."
Each year, the program accepts the first 12 applicants.
Eighty dollars covers meals, materials, a medical scrub top
and the CPR registration fee. Applicants, who come from all
over the state, are asked to write a short essay about why
they want to be in the program.
"In our initial planning stages there was a contest in
the nursing department to name the camp," said Michelle
Slafkosky, the camp's co-founder - with former colleague
Deborah Mello - and the hospital's manager of volunteer
services. "Since we want students to see all the careers in
a hospital, we didn't want it to sound like a nursing camp."
Like the rest of her peers at last Tuesday's intensive
CPR training, 15-year-old Rebecca Rose, a home-schooled
sophomore from Baltimore, was dressed in a blue scrub top
and beige khaki pants - attire similar to what health care
professionals wear everyday on the job.
Rose's aunt and uncle work as a pediatric nurse and an
anesthesiologist, respectively. Growing up around them
inspired her to consider a career in health care. But Camp
ECHO, she said, also opened her eyes to some of what she
considers the more gruesome realities of the profession.
"The O.R. is cool, but I don't think I want to work
there," said Rose while taking a short break from her CPR
training. "I can't deal with all the blood. It's just not
for me." She enjoyed visiting the orthopedic floor during
another group tour of the hospital, she said.
For Sade Handy, 15, nursing seems to run in the family.
"Some of my aunts are nurses," said Handy, a sophomore at
Reach Partnership in Baltimore. "I like being in the camp.
It's fun going to the different units, learning different
things. I haven't seen anything that I don't like or that
isn't interesting."
Shannon Cummins' mother is a cardiac nurse at St. Agnes.
The 17-year-old Arundel High School senior is seriously
considering becoming an emergency room nurse. "I like the
idea of caring for people I don't even know, and just
helping people," Cummins said.
Many of this year's participants have yet to declare a
college major, but the program's directors and volunteers
said one of the goals is to lure students into the health
care field early by showing them the rewards and challenges
of working on behalf of others - and to steer some toward a
different profession better suited to their talents and
interests.
"We had one student who saw the O.R. room and decided
she never wanted to step foot in there again," said Joyce
Hall with a chuckle. A longtime registered nurse and the
hospital's patient relations coordinator, Hall has worked
with the camp since 2004 and now coordinates the program
with Slafkosky. "That student went on to become a social
worker.
"Everything we do here is optional," said Hall, adding
that participants can choose not to witness a live birth,
view in-progress knee surgeries or visit the morgue -
activities offered at past camps. Hall prepares the
curriculum, arranges hospital tours and chooses guest
presenters such as Vonda Barber, last Tuesday's CPR
instructor from Health Quest Inc.
"I use the same lessons with these high schoolers that I
use with adults," said Barber between drills, which involved
performing procedures on a T-shirted rubber dummy. Campers
learned how to properly pump its chest, perform
mouth-to-mouth and check for consciousness by shaking its
shoulders and shouting, "Are you OK?" using real-life
scenarios.
"What's the first thing you need to do when deciding
whether to do CPR on someone?" Barber asked the group during
one of their drills. Although they gave the correct answer -
to check that "the scene is safe" - they sounded like
whispering angels, and needed to be told by Nyuma Harrison,
an ER nurse at St. Agnes and program volunteer, to speak up.
"You have to say it!" said Harrison from the side of the
room. Harrison teaches clinical skills courses at the
Catholic University of America in Washington and brought her
lesson plan to the campers last Friday.
"You usually hear kids say they want to be a surgeon or
a pediatrician because that's what they see on TV," said
Harrison. "It was good for them to see the food service area
where we prepare patients' meals. Every job at a hospital is
important."
Since 2004, 43 students have completed the program.
Slafkosky said she plans to contact past campers to see how
many chose the health care profession, one of few industries
still thriving since the recession hit in late 2007.
"It was very beneficial for me,"said Jones, who plans to
return to school for a second degree in nursing.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
Coxsackieviruses may cause conjunctivitis, herpangina and
hand, foot and mouth disease
Expert advice
Ask the Expert: Robert Ancona, St. Joseph Medical Center
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Coxsackieviruses can cause many clinical syndromes that
overlap with other viruses, including common cold symptoms,
fever, sore throat, rashes, eye infections and diarrhea,
says Dr. Robert Ancona, chief of pediatrics at St. Joseph
Medical Center.
He writes that the three most identifiable syndromes
caused by coxsackieviruses are: acute hemorrhagic
conjunctivitis, herpangina and hand, foot and mouth disease.
•Preschool-age children, especially those 1¿ to 3 years
old, are most at risk to catch these viruses, though any age
group can be affected, especially with acute hemorrhagic
conjunctivitis. These viruses are often passed around by a
fecal-to-mouth route or direct contact with infected
secretions from the mouth or eyes. Therefore, good hand
washing, as with many infectious illnesses, is extremely
important in preventing infections.
•The symptoms of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis are
painful red eyes, tearing and swelling of the eyelids,
usually within one to three days of swimming in a communal
pool. Outbreaks with numerous cases usually occur. Symptoms
can last a week to 10 days.
•Herpangina usually produces a high fever (101 to 104
degrees), irritability, decreased appetite and multiple
blisters or ulcers in the back of the throat. Younger
children often drool more than normal and their symptoms can
last up to seven days, though older children may recover in
three days.
Hand, foot and mouth disease has similar symptoms, plus
a blistering rash on the hands, feet, and/or buttocks,
usually below the skin's surface and which may begin as
papules. The blisters are usually not painful.
•There is no specific treatment for any of the coxsackie
syndromes. But the symptoms can be treated, for example,
with analgesics for fever and pain and with fluids,
especially cool ones, that may relieve throat pain. For
conjunctivitis, try cool compresses for relief.
•Complications from these infections are uncommon, but
for younger infants who refuse to drink due to blisters in
their throats, dehydration is a risk, so proper fluids are
very important. In rare cases, the abrupt onset of high
fever can trigger a febrile seizure in those who are
susceptible. Most importantly, children are contagious
throughout the entire illness and must not be in a school or
communal setting until all symptoms go away, which can be as
long as a week.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
Judge to
decide if mother was insane
Attorneys: Kent Island woman told nurse practitioner she
planned to kill her daughter
By Scott Daugherty
Annapolis Capital
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
A Kent Island woman knew it was wrong last December when
she killed her 3-year-old daughter and tried to kill
herself, but she was so depressed she couldn't stop herself,
according to a psychiatrist hired by her defense attorney.
Courtesy photo Victoria A. Sparrow, Stevensville mother
charged with killing her 3-year-old daughter, Laci.
But in the first day of a two-day trial yesterday in
Queen Anne's County Circuit Court in Centreville, two
state-paid psychiatrists testified that Victoria Sparrow
planned how she was going to kill the girl - even laying out
those plans six weeks earlier to a nurse practitioner at the
family doctor's office. They said Sparrow was able to
control her actions in almost every other aspect of her
life.
"She was able to delay acting," said Dr. Annette Hanson,
a forensic psychiatrist at the state's Clifton T. Perkins
Hospital Center in Jessup. "This was someone who thought
about it ... and carried it out."
All three doctors testified as part of an extended
nine-hour hearing to determine if Sparrow, 43, of
Stevensville, was legally insane Dec. 18 when she poisoned
her daughter, Laci, inside their home.
Sparrow pleaded guilty yesterday to first-degree murder
in the death, but argued she was "not criminally
responsible" for her actions because she could not control
herself, prompting the rare, contested hearing, which
focused entirely on the doctors, their opinions and how they
reached those opinions.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys this morning began
their closing arguments before Judge Thomas G. Ross, but
neither attorney expected him to issue an immediate ruling.
"There is just so much information," said Queen Anne's
County State's Attorney Lance Richardson, echoing the
comments of defense attorney Peter S. O'Neill.
Ross - not a jury - will make the final decision.
If found responsible, Sparrow, who is being held at the
Queen Anne's County Detention Center, faces up to life in
prison.
If found not criminally responsible, Sparrow can be held
at a state hospital until a doctor decides she is no longer
a danger to herself or others.
Sparrow, a Severna Park High School graduate and a clerk
for Anne Arundel County Circuit Court in Annapolis, admitted
yesterday that she ground up numerous prescription drugs,
including codeine and Ambien, and mixed them into her
daughter's food. She then tried to kill herself with the
same drug mixture, according to court testimony.
All three experts diagnosed Sparrow with major
depressive disorder, a relatively common mental disorder
characterized by general sadness and malaise lasting several
weeks or months. They said Sparrow was depressed because her
marriage was falling apart and she was having trouble at
work.
The experts were surprised to learn about a Nov. 5
doctor's appointment in Stevensville. They said Sparrow told
a nurse practitioner she was considering using sedatives to
kill herself, her daughter and her dog, but that medical
professional did not contact the authorities or otherwise
try to get Sparrow committed to a psychiatric hospital.
After hearing Sparrow had just stopped taking the
antidepressant Prozac for fear it was causing the suicidal
thoughts, the nurse practitioner let her go home with the
instruction to come back if she didn't feel better, the
doctors said.
"I think they misjudged the level of malignance," said
Dr. David Williamson, the forensic psychiatrist hired by the
defense.
Officials with the doctor's office could not be reached
for comment this morning.
But the two state experts disagreed with the defense
expert on why Sparrow decided to kill her child. Dr. Monica
Polk, another forensic psychiatrist, said Sparrow did it to
hurt her husband, Jeffrey.
"I believe it was primarily a revenge killing," Polk
said.
That motive, coupled with the facts that Sparrow planned
the homicide in advance, didn't act immediately and was
otherwise able to live a normal life, led the two
psychiatrists to conclude that Sparrow was capable of
controlling herself and was therefore legally responsible
for her actions.
Williamson, however, said Sparrow had altruistic motives
when she killed her daughter. He believed the homicide was a
misguided attempt to protect the girl from a life without a
mother.
"She felt the child would have suffered if she was not
there," he said, arguing she was not criminally responsible.
Paramedics and police were called to Sparrow's home
shortly before 3 p.m. after her 18-year-old son called 911
and reported that his mother was sick and disoriented.
Medics arrived, searched the home and found Laci alone
and unconscious in the master bedroom. The girl and her
mother were taken to Anne Arundel Medical Center in Parole,
where the child died at 3:40 p.m.
According to court testimony, Sparrow almost died as
well. She was on a ventilator for several hours at the
hospital before she ultimately woke up and confessed to what
she had done.
Sparrow came to court yesterday wearing mismatched
prison scrubs - green pants and a dark brown shirt over a
white, long-sleeved thermal T-shirt. She sat quietly next to
her attorney for most of the hearing, not moving or speaking
to anyone.
A handful of friends and family sat behind Sparrow in
the courtroom, some supporting the defense and others
supporting the prosecution. After the hearing ended,
Sparrow's detractors said Richardson had made his case.
"Laci will get her justice," said Heather Sparrow, the
slain girl's half-sister.
Copyright 2009 Annapolis Capital.
Obama's drug chief looks to Baltimore for ideas
City's drug court is object of 3rd visit since May
By Tricia Bishop
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Barack Obama's newly appointed drug czar is looking to
Baltimore to help set the nation's strategy, focusing on the
city's 15-year-old drug treatment court, which emphasizes
therapy over incarceration.
Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug
Control Policy, met with legislators and a drug court judge
Monday to discuss the program and collaborative efforts
between city, state and federal agencies. It was
Kerlikowske's third visit to the city since his May
swearing-in.
Released prisoners "almost invariably go back to the
neighborhood from whence they came," he said after the
briefing during a news conference held in the lobby of the
Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center. Without
treatment, "all we're doing is recycling people throughout
the system. It makes no sense."
The words underscore early suggestions that the Obama
administration will focus on drugs as a public health issue,
rather than just a law enforcement problem. And in
Baltimore, drug addiction and the resulting crime "is the
most significant public health crisis" there is, said Greg
Warren, president of Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems Inc.,
which sets the city's drug strategy.
Each year, the prison system returns 9,000 convicts to
Baltimore streets, and, for most of them, to the drug abuse
that led them to incarceration in the first place. Most of
the city's criminal activity is drug-related, with 80
percent of those arrested here - four out of five people -
failing their initial drug tests.
The first drug treatment court was developed in Florida
in 1989, as crack cocaine use was labeled an epidemic and
the "war on drugs" ratcheted up arrests. The idea was to
lessen the burden on courts and jails by trying treatment
before imprisonment.
The courts quickly grew in popularity, and today, there
are more than 1,000 of them across the country, according to
a 2005 University of Maryland report that studied the
effects of Baltimore's version, which was created in 1994 in
response to a city Bar Association claim that 85 percent of
Baltimore crimes were addiction-driven.
In many ways, it resembles other such federally funded
programs throughout the country. Participants must live in
the city and be at least 18, and they can't have violent
offense convictions on their records. They're also
supervised and regularly drug-tested during their treatment.
But Baltimore's intensive probation supervision, and the
significant participation of the Division of Parole and
Probation, are atypical, the university report said.
According to statistics presented yesterday by Rep.
Elijah E. Cummings, who called for the gathering,
Baltimore's drug treatment court participants are more than
three times as likely as other convicts to be employed after
the program, and they're a third as likely to use drugs
during treatment.
"We want Baltimore to be a model," Cummings said during
the conference, which was also attended by Mayor Sheila
Dixon and Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin.
In an interview afterward, Cummings stressed the need
for more resources and the role the federal government has
in providing them. That's the main reason he wanted
Kerlikowske to become familiar with Baltimore's system.
"You want the federal government to be sensitive to
things that are working," Cummings said. That ensures that
"the city has a better chance at getting the resources it
needs."
Kerlikowske said he got the message and "absolutely"
plans to incorporate Baltimore's efforts into the country's
policy.
Copyright © 2009, The Baltimore Sun.
Md. Doctor's Life Unravels Amid Drug, Assault Charges
Reports of Erratic Behavior Set Stage for 2 Trials
By Dan Morse
Washington Post
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
There was a time when Bethesda doctor Eric Greenberg had
a loyal following of more than 100 patients. "The best
diagnostician I ever saw," said one. "Brilliant," recalled
another.
On Tuesday, though, Greenberg faces trial on drug
possession charges linked to an April raid of his home
office, where police said they found cocaine, powdered
Ritalin, a meth pipe and the doctor in a dazed state with
needle marks on his arms so fresh they were still bleeding.
All the while, police said, patients were trickling in for
their appointments.
Greenberg faces a second trial next month related to
dust-ups just outside the office.
A next-door neighbor alleges that the internist barreled
over a set of potted plants in his Mercedes-Benz and, when
confronted, knocked the neighbor's tooth out. Police who
showed up to ask questions said Greenberg took a swing at
one of them, had to be shocked with a stun gun, and was
charged with two counts of assaulting an officer.
"This is a tragedy," said Dianne Ferris, wife of Michael
Hazlett, the man who said he lost a tooth.
Ferris, a veterinarian whose office is next to
Greenberg's, said longtime patients of Greenberg's still
show up, even though he has halted his practice and faces
criminal charges.
"He's got some very normal people looking for him,"
Ferris said.
James Papirmeister, Greenberg's defense attorney, said
his client denies assaulting the officers or his neighbor.
He said Greenberg also intends to plead not guilty to the
drug possession charges. "We intend to establish that he
didn't possess or use any illegal drugs," Papirmeister said.
"We feel he is being treated much more harshly because
he is a medical doctor," Papirmeister said.
On April 16, after the raid, the Maryland Board of
Physicians suspended Greenberg's medical license. James
Charles, a lawyer who represented Greenberg in two previous
matters before the Board of Physicians, declined to comment.
Greenberg, who was born in Baltimore, received a medical
degree from the University of Maryland in 1993, according to
the school and court records. For a time, he practiced near
White Flint Mall, said a patient from those days, Edwin
Mills, 50.
"He's smarter than regular people. It's not even a
race," Mills said.
By 2004, Greenberg was practicing at his home office on
Old Georgetown Road when a patient complained to the Board
of Physicians that during an appointment, Greenberg wobbled,
seem to be falling asleep and had dried blood under his
nose.
Regulators found that in 2004, he had sped through a
parking lot at Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, nearly hitting
two police officers standing outside their cruisers, on his
way to see a patient at 11:20 p.m. Another time, he appeared
at the hospital's emergency room desk, looking dazed and
holding on to a desk as if he was unsteady, according to
Board of Physicians records.
The regulators paid an announced call to Greenberg's
office, finding him dazed and with sores on his hands and
ankles, records indicate. Greenberg told them that he was
working seven days a week, 20 hours a day.
The regulators asked Greenberg to see a psychiatrist,
who diagnosed deficits in attention, organization and
speech, board records say. "These conditions are consistent
with and provide an explanation for the complainant's
observations," the psychiatrist reported to the board.
The Board of Physicians placed Greenberg on probation.
The probation was lifted quickly after he took a drug test,
according to the Board of Physicians records.
Ferris said she rarely interacted with Greenberg.
Several years ago, at about 6:30 a.m., she looked out a
window and saw Greenberg, wearing a T-shirt, making snow
angels on the hood of his car, she said.
State medical regulators received another complaint in
2006. They subpoenaed records of six patients from
Greenberg, according to a Board of Physicians summary of the
investigation. He was prescribing excessive amounts of
Ritalin for a relative and "more than usual amounts" of
oxycodone to another patient, according to the Board of
Physicians.
The board ordered Greenberg to take classes on writing
prescriptions for pain management and on keeping records,
told him to see a psychiatrist and placed him on three
years' probation.
In fall 2008, pharmacists told authorities about
suspicions that Greenberg was writing prescriptions for drug
addicts, according to the state board. Montgomery County and
federal narcotics agents closed in, arriving at his office
April 1. At the time, Greenberg, his wife and his
brother-in-law were upstairs, in the residence above the
office.
Agents reported that Greenberg had needle marks on his
arms and feet and that he tested positive for cocaine, state
medical records show.
Papirmeister said his client denies injecting drugs.
"Those are not track marks," he said of the assertions made
in the physician board's report on the drug raid. "He has a
number of skin conditions," including neurodermatitis, that
cause him to itch and scratch constantly.
Greenberg's wife, Jaquenette I. Fischman, told agents
that she had grown concerned about her husband's track marks
and had been trying to hide injectable drugs from him,
according to Board of Physicians records filed in court. She
admitted inhaling Ritalin and said she had seen her husband
doing so, according to the records.
Police charged Fischman with drug possession. Her trial
was scheduled for Thursday, but her attorney, John Kudel,
wants it advanced to Tuesday. He expects her to plead not
guilty.
Her husband also faces the August trial on charges of
assaulting the officers. During the altercation, police
said, he called one officer a "murdering Nazi" and called
another officer "giggle google man." Greenberg allegedly
also told the second officer that he was lucky that
Greenberg had left his meat cleaver in the house and spared
the officer's life.
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.
BWMC
named one of nation's top hospitals
Magazine ranks facility for care of neurology, digestive
disorders
By Allison Bourg
Annapolis Capital
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Baltimore Washington Medical Center has been named to
U.S. News and World Report's annual list of America's top
hospitals in two separate categories of care.
Advertisement
The Glen Burnie hospital ranks 43 out of 50 hospitals in
neurology and neurosurgery and in digestive disorders,
according to the report released Thursday.
It's the first time BWMC has made the list, which the
magazine has compiled for the past 20 years. In April, U.S.
News and World Report named BWMC one of the country's 65
best community hospitals.
"It wasn't something we were striving to be in," said
Dr. Larry Linder, senior vice president of the hospital and
its chief medical officer. "We're just trying to provide
excellent customer service and be a place where the staff
wants to come to work."
U.S. News and World Report looked at 4,861 hospitals in
16 specialties. To be a candidate for the ranking, a
hospital first had to meet any one of three criteria: Be a
teaching hospital, have at least 200 beds, or have at least
100 beds and at least four out of eight important medical
technologies, such as current-generation CT scanners and
precision radiation therapies.
This year, 44 percent of all hospitals met that test,
according to the magazine. Each of those hospitals were
scored from zero to 100, based on reputation, death rate,
patient safety and care-related factors such as nursing and
patient services.
The hospitals that made the top 50 in at least one of
the 16 specialities were included in the final report.
BWMC received a ranking of 23.8 for neurology and
neurosurgery and 18.9 for digestive disorders, putting it
several points ahead of two other major area health-care
providers in both specialties.
It was the only community hospital in the county to make
the list.
Anne Arundel Medical Center in Parole ranked 19.3 in
neurology and 12.8 in digestive disorders, while Harbor
Hospital in Baltimore ranked 19.6 in neurology and 16.1 in
digestive disorders. Neither made the top 50.
Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, consistently named
the best hospital in the country, scored at the top of the
list in six separate categories.
Diane Bartoo, program director for health care
administration at the University of Maryland's graduate
school of management and technology, said the annual report
contains much useful information for both patients and
doctors. "Some of the information is hard data - for
example, the mortality index. Some of the information, such
as reputation, is based on surveys of specialists in the
field," Bartoo wrote in an e-mail. "The detail in the
rankings offers a reference point to begin an important
discussion with one's physician or health care provider."
Dr. Cliff Solomon, a neurosurgeon at BWMC as well as
Johns Hopkins, said in a prepared statement that BWMC's
neurosurgery program is a multi-faceted one.
"We work closely on a multidisciplinary approach with
orthopedic spine, ear nose and throat and neurology
specialists and have collaborative arrangements with
tertiary care facilities to ensure the best care for
patients," Soloman said.
"The nurses and support staff are excellent, making
quality care and patient safety a top priority with each
procedure."
Linder said he's particularly proud of BWMC's ranking
because reputation counts for 30 percent of the final score.
U.S. News and World Report gave BWMC a ranking of zero in
that category, something not unexpected because it's a small
community hospital.
"It's not surprising that we're not known in, say,
California," Linder said. "So we had to do better in the
other categories."
Linder said one of the 311-bed hospital's biggest
strengths is its close-knit staff.
"Hospitals in Maryland have an average (job) vacancy
rate of 10 to 13 percent," he said. "At BWMC, it's 1 to 2
percent, and we get worried when it gets up near 2 percent."
Nurses and other employees tend to stick around for
years, Linder said. The hospital's former CEO, James R.
Walker, retired last year after nearly 40 years at BWMC. His
replacement, Karen Olscamp, has been with BWMC for more than
two decades.
"That's typical for almost all our employees," Linder
said. "It's a cycle that feeds on itself."
Dr. George Kurian, BWMC's chief of gastroenterology,
also had words of praise for the staff.
"I've been here for more than 20 years. The work
environment is excellent," Kurian said. "We have a
dedicated, competent staff, especially the nursing staff.
They deserve a lot of credit."
Kurian said upgrades to the technology in his department
and an increase in services likely landed BWMC a spot on the
list. The hospital also serves a much wider population than
it did just a few years ago, he said.
The complete report can be viewed online at
http://usnews.com/besthospitals.
Copyright 2009 Annapolis Capital.
National / International
Drink lots of water to avoid kidney stones (and other tips!)
Daily Press (Newport News, Va.)
By Alison Johnson
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Those solid masses that form in the kidneys can grow big
enough to cause severe pain and even infection as they pass
into the urinary tract.
Here are some tips from doctors on preventing stones
from developing:
Drink lots of water. Kidney stones are made of salts and
minerals in urine that stick together. Extra fluids help
keep urine clear -- it should be clear-colored or light
yellow; dark yellow means you're not drinking enough. Sip
water throughout the day, not just in occasional binges.
Lose excess weight. Studies show people who are
overweight are significantly more likely to get kidney
stones.
Control diabetes. The chronic disease interferes with
healthy kidney function. Note: Kidney stones can be a sign
of diabetes, as well as high blood pressure and
osteoporosis. If you get a stone, ask your doctor for
further testing.
Be a detective. Different substances cause kidney stones
in different people, so recommended dietary changes can vary
widely. Work with your doctor to determine your situation.
Some people, for example, do well by focusing on getting
enough calcium and fiber, reducing protein intake and
avoiding salt.
Avoid grapefruit juice. In general, citrus juices seem
to help reduce the acidity of urine. The exception is
grapefruit juice, which studies show increases the risk of
stones. Also be careful not to go above daily
recommendations for vitamins C and D.
Exercise regularly. People who aren't active may be at
higher risk. Get out and do something, even if it's just a
short walk every day.
Ask about medicine. Depending on what substances are in
a kidney stone, drugs can help control its growth, dissolve
it or prevent new stones from forming.
Copyright © 2009, South Florida Sun-Sentinel.
Medical marijuana science, through the smoke
Support for medical use of cannabis is growing; research
is mostly favorable, but there is some caution.
Health Sense
By Judy Foreman
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Marcy Duda, a former home health aide with four children
and two granddaughters, never dreamed she'd be publicly
touting the medical benefits of pot.
But marijuana, says the 48-year-old Ware, Mass.,
resident, is the only thing that even begins to control the
migraine headaches that plague her nine days a month, which
she describes as feeling like "hot, hot ice picks in the
left side of my head."
Duda has always had migraines. But they got much worse
10 years ago after two operations to remove life-threatening
aneurysms, weak areas in the blood vessels in her brain.
None of the standard drugs her doctors prescribe help much
with her post-surgical symptoms, which include nausea,
vomiting, loss of appetite and pain on her left side "as if
my body were cut in half."
With marijuana, however, "I can at least leave the dark
room," she says, "and it makes me eat a lot of food."
The culture wars over marijuana, for recreational and
medical use, have been simmering for decades, with marijuana
(cannabis) still classified, like heroin, as a Schedule I
controlled substance by the U.S. government, meaning it has
no approved medical use. (There is a government-approved
synthetic form of marijuana called Marinol available as a
prescription pill for treating nausea, vomiting and loss of
appetite, though advocates of the natural stuff say it is
not as effective as smoked pot.)
Some critics of marijuana use, such as David Evans,
special advisor to the Drug Free America Foundation of St.
Petersburg, Fla., applaud the government's view, saying
marijuana has not gone through a rigorous U.S. Food and Drug
Administration approval process.
But that skepticism frustrates leading marijuana
researchers such as Dr. Donald Abrams, a cancer specialist
at San Francisco General Hospital.
"Every day I see people with nausea secondary to
chemotherapy, depression, trouble sleeping, pain," he says.
"I can recommend one drug [marijuana] for all those things,
as opposed to writing five different prescriptions."
The tide seems to be turning in favor of wider medical
use of marijuana. The Obama administration announced in
March that it will end the Bush administration's practice of
frequently raiding distributors of medical marijuana.
Thirteen states, including California, Vermont, Rhode Island
and Maine, now allow medical use of marijuana, according to
Bruce Mirken, spokesman for the Marijuana Policy Project,
which advocates legalization of pot. Earlier this month,
however, New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch vetoed legislation
that would have legalized medical marijuana in that state.
A growing body of research supports the drug's medical
usage, but some of it is cautionary. As Abrams puts it, "you
can find anything you want in the medical literature about
what marijuana does and doesn't do."
With that in mind, here's an overview of what the
research says about the safety and effectiveness of using
marijuana to treat various ailments.
Pain: Marijuana has been shown effective against
various forms of severe, chronic pain. Some research
suggests it helps with migraines, cluster headaches and the
pain from fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome because
these problems can be triggered by an underlying deficiency
in the brain of naturally occurring cannabinoids,
ingredients in marijuana. Smoked pot also proved better than
placebo cigarettes at relieving nerve pain in HIV patients,
according to two recent studies by California researchers.
Marijuana also seems to be effective against nerve pain
that is resistant to opiates.
Cancer: The active ingredients in cannabis have
been shown to combat pain, nausea and loss of appetite in
cancer patients, as well as block tumor growth in lab
animals, according to a review article in the journal Nature
in October 2003. But there's vigorous debate about whether
smoking marijuana increases cancer risk.
Some studies that have looked for a link between cancer
risk and marijuana have failed to find one, including a key
paper from UCLA published in 2006. "We had hypothesized,
based on prior laboratory evidence, including animal
studies, that long-term heavy use of marijuana would
increase the risk of lung and head and neck cancers," said
Hal Morgenstern, a co-author and an epidemiologist at the
University of Michigan School of Public Health. "But we
didn't get any evidence of that, once we controlled for
confounding factors, especially cigarette smoking."
But in California, the first state to legalize marijuana
for medical use, in 1996, the Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment recently declared pot smoke (though not
the plant itself) a carcinogen because it has some of the
same harmful substances as tobacco smoke.
The active ingredient in marijuana can increase the risk
for Kaposi's sarcoma, a common cancer in HIV/AIDS patients,
Harvard researchers reported in the journal Cancer Research
in August 2007. And British researchers reported in May in
Chemical Research in Toxicology that laboratory experiments
showed that pot smoke can damage DNA, suggesting it might
cause cancer.
The federal government's National Institute on Drug
Abuse says that it is "not yet determined" whether marijuana
increases the risk for lung and other cancers.
Respiratory problems: Smoking one marijuana joint
has similar adverse effects on lung function as 2 1/2 to
five cigarettes, according to a New Zealand study published
in Thorax in July 2007. A small Australian study published
in Respirology in January 2008 showed that pot smoking can
lead to one type of lung disease 20 years earlier than
tobacco smoking.
Addictive potential: The National Institute on
Drug Abuse says "repeated use could lead to addiction,"
adding that some heavy users experience withdrawal symptoms
such as irritability and sleep loss if they stop suddenly.
Mental effects: Cannabis may increase the risk of
psychotic disorders, according to a 2002 study in the
American Journal of Epidemiology. And the national drug
abuse agency warns that "heavy or daily use of marijuana
affects the parts of the brain that control memory,
attention and learning." A study of 15 heavy pot smokers
published in June 2008 in the Archives of General Psychiatry
showed loss of tissue in two areas of the brain, the
hippocampus and amygdala, regions that are rich in receptors
for marijuana and important for memory and emotion,
respectively.
Vaporizing vs. smoking: The push now among
proponents of medical marijuana is toward inhaling the
vapor, not smoking. Vaporizing is a safe and effective way
of getting THC, the active ingredient, into the bloodstream
and does not result in inhalation of toxic carbon monoxide,
as smoking does, according to a study by Abrams published in
2007 in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Bottom line: From a purely medical, not
political, point of view, my take is that if I had medical
problems that other medications did not help and that
marijuana might, I'd try it -- in vaporized form.
Just as Marcy Duda does. "You use it as you need it. You
can be normal. You can function," she says. "I don't get
high. I get by."
Foreman writes the monthly Health Sense column. Read
others at
www.myhealthsense.com.
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times.
Should schools
close for swine flu?
By Kelly Brewington
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Public health officials worldwide are preparing for the
onslaught of the fall flu season, expecting swine flu to
come back with a vengance. So far, the virus has killed some
700 people around the globe and drug makers are working in a
hurry to have a vaccine ready by October.
But that's a good two months after school children --
one of the groups at highest risk for the virus, known as
H1N1 -- return to their classrooms. What if an outbreak hits
before vaccines are ready? Should schools be closed?
A study in the August issue of the British journal
Lancet Infectious Diseases concludes it's a tough call and
the decision to close schools depends on how severe the
pandemic becomes.
On one hand, closing schools might slow transmission,
giving more time for a vaccine to be finished while easing
the burden on hospitals. But researchers also said that
massive school closures are unlikely to have a major impact
on the total cases. And closing schools has some serious
economic and social costs, from the crush to a household's
income from parents who must take off work to care for a
child, to the larger economic impact on workplaces from
massive absenteeism. (The economic toll alone: the cost of a
12-week school closure could be between 1 percent and 3
percent of GDP, according to the study. yikes)
So far, kids have been disproportionatly affected by the
virus, with some 60 percent of cases occuring in people 18
or younger.
Back when the outbreak started in the spring, U.S.
health officials played it safe, ordering schools with a
confirmed case of swine flu to close for a week. But they
backed off that policy after it became clear that the virus
was spreading rapidly and appeared no more severe than
seasonal flu.
Still, medical experts warn the virus may become more
severe this fall. Clearly, vaccine timing will be key. While
health officials say they hope to have a vaccine by October,
there are more questions than answers right now about who
gets it and when. Here's an interesting timeline put
together by WebMD on some possibilities.
So, for now, what do you think? Could closing schools
help stop the flu?
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.
Lupus
drug passes key test, researchers say
The experimental treatment Benlysta greatly reduced
symptoms of the autoimmune disorder in a test, says Human
Genome Sciences. The findings offer hope that a 50-year
drought in new drugs may end.
The Los Angeles Times
By Thomas H. Maugh II
Baltimore Sun
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
After a 50-year drought of new drugs and a string of
disappointing failures of potential treatments for lupus,
researchers said Monday that they have found an experimental
drug that can ameliorate the symptoms of the
life-threatening autoimmune disorder that afflicts as many
as 1.5 million Americans.
In unpublished results released by the company, a team
from Human Genome Sciences said that the experimental drug
Benlysta significantly reduced lupus symptoms in a
randomized trial of more than 850 patients, reducing their
need for debilitating steroids and improving quality of
life.
In recent years, at least seven companies or coalitions
of companies have reported failed or unimpressive results
with potential lupus treatments, causing a cloud of gloom to
settle over the lupus community.
"We have had many disappointments, so for [a drug] to
make it through the door with a very significant success
rate is an extraordinary accomplishment," said Margaret G.
Dowd, president of the Lupus Research Institute, who was not
involved in the research. Not only does the trial offer
lupus patients the hope of a new treatment with fewer side
effects, she said, but it should also offer encouragement to
other companies with lupus drugs in the pipeline.
"Everybody was getting a little discouraged," added Dr.
Betty Diamond, chief of the autoimmune disease center at
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System's Feinstein
Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y., who was
also not involved in the research. "It's very exciting to
finally have a trial in lupus showing efficacy.
"We're going to have to work with it longer to
understand when it should be used and exactly who is going
to benefit from it . . . but we are very pleased to have a
drug that looks as though it really did do something," said
Diamond, who is an advisor to the Lupus Research Institute.
Experts cautioned, however, that because the results
have not been peer-reviewed or published in a journal, it is
difficult to fully assess their significance. Human Genome
Sciences said the results will be presented at a meeting
later this year and published after a second study is
completed. A spokesman said the robust nature of the data
and the 50-year drought in drugs justified releasing the
data now.
Lupus is a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs when
the body's immune system attacks its own tissues and organs.
As many as 90% of patients are women, usually in their 30s
and 40s when it first strikes. No two cases of lupus are
identical, but symptoms can include fatigue, fever, joint
pain, stiffness and swelling, rashes, skin lesions, mouth
sores, hair loss and chest pain. The disease can attack many
internal organs, leading eventually to death.
Only three drugs are approved for treating lupus --
aspirin, the steroid prednisone and the antimalarial drug
Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) -- and all were
approvedduringthe Eisenhoweradministration. All can have
severe side effects, including stomach bleeding for aspirin;
weight gain, bruising, high blood pressure and diabetes for
prednisone; and vision problems and muscle weakness for
Plaquenil.
Even more powerful drugs are often used off-label for
treating severe cases, including the anti-rejection drugs
cyclophosphamide and azathioprene, which can have even more
serious side effects.
Benlysta is a monoclonal antibody known generically as
belimumab. An immune protein produced artificially, it binds
to and blocks the activity of a protein called B-lymphocyte
stimulator, which was discovered by the company. Elevated
levels of B-lymphocyte stimulator are believed to contribute
to the production of antibodies that attack the patient's
own organs.
The new trial was conducted in 865 patients at 90 sites
in 13 countries, primarily abroad. Patients all had active
lupus, although none had a severe form requiring
hospitalization, and received normal care for the disease.
In addition, they were randomized into three groups, two
receiving different amounts of the drug and the third
receiving a placebo. Patients were given an infusion of the
drug at the beginning of the trial, at two weeks, at four
weeks, and then every four weeks after that. They were
followed for 52 weeks.
About 58% of patients receiving the highest dose of
Benlysta showed a significant improvement on an index used
to assess impact, compared with 46% of those receiving the
placebo. More of the patients receiving the drug were able
to reduce their prednisone intake, and most reported a
better quality of life, although specific numbers were not
provided.
About 6% of both patients receiving the drug and those
on the placebo suffered side effects, including headache,
joint pain and infections.
The patients receiving the drug showed the improvement
while reducing their use of steroids, said Dr. Kenneth
Kalunian of UC San Diego, who was not involved in the study.
"The fact that they could taper off steroids in the drug
group really speaks well for the drug." Dr. Daniel Wallace
of UCLA's Geffen School of Medicine treated patients with
the drug in an earlier study and has been continuing to
treat them, some for as long as four years. "They keep
getting better and better," he said. "This is going to be a
major breakthrough, no question about it."
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times.
Doctor's Orders
Want Treatment? Just Sign This No-Complaint Contract . .
.
By Sandra G. Boodman
Washington Post
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Until recently, patients whose doctors kept them waiting
for hours without explanation, brushed off their questions
or seemed downright incompetent had little recourse, other
than complaining to family, friends or, in egregious cases,
the state medical board. That was before the Internet gave
everyone with an e-mail address the ability to reach a
vastly wider audience by posting -- often anonymously --
critiques of doctors, in much the same way travelers rate
hotels on such Web sites as TripAdvisor.
In the past five years more than 40 Web sites, among
them RateMDs.com, Angie's List, Yelp, DrScore and Vitals.com
(motto: "where doctors are examined"), have begun reviewing
physicians, providing information about one of the more
difficult and important decisions consumers make routinely.
As these sites proliferate -- a reflection of the hunger
for information about doctors in an era where patients are
expected to make sophisticated decisions about their care --
questions about their usefulness, accuracy and fairness are
intensifying. In some cases the freewheeling anonymity of
the Internet has collided with the rights of physicians who
are constrained by laws that protect patient privacy.
As a defensive measure, some physicians are requiring
patients to sign broad agreements that prohibit online
postings or commentary in any media outlet "without prior
written consent."
Critics call the documents gag orders. Many experts say
they are both unethical and unenforceable.
But an increasing number of doctors view them as an
appropriate response to sites that not only ask detailed
questions about a doctor's punctuality, availability,
communication skills, office staff and the effectiveness of
treatment, but also permit comments that may be untrue. Some
are scathing.
Case in point: A veteran District internist has
attracted nearly 40 comments on one site, compared with the
more typical one or two. Most are negative, focusing on his
off-putting demeanor, dirty office and hostile staff.
"The worst doctor I have ever encountered in my life,"
one recent posting said. "Impolite, unengaged and
unfocused." Said another: "Long wait, rude staff, never sent
me a follow-up on my tests."
To Angie Hicks, founder of Angie's List, which last year
added doctors to its reviews of plumbers and roofers,
physician ratings are an extension of the contemporary
zeitgeist.
"Consumers have been talking about their experiences
with physicians forever," she said. "It's moved online, just
as other parts of our communication with friends and family
have.''
Unlike other sites that rate doctors, Angie's List does
not allow anonymous postings (the site knows writers'
identities, although the public does not) and its reviews
are available only to members who pay a fee.
Many other sites are free and accessible to the public.
John Swapceinski, a founder of RateMDs.com, one of the
oldest and largest sites, said he was inspired by the
success of the reviews on Amazon.com and thought consumer
rankings could be applied to professors and physicians.
After Swapceinski launched RateMyProfessors.com, he took
RateMDs live in 2004.
Supported largely by ad revenue from Google, it contains
ratings of more than 200,000 physicians across the country,
more than 8,000 of them in the District, Maryland and
Virginia. The site attracts a million unique visitors per
month, Swapceinski said, as well as the ire of some doctors.
RateMDs contains a link to the relevant medical board where
patients can check disciplinary histories and, in some
states, malpractice payments.
"We get threatened with lawsuits on a pretty much weekly
basis," he said, adding that none has been filed. Nor,
Swapceinski said, has he acceded to demands by doctors to
remove comments he deems appropriate, although there is a
mechanism by which doctors can respond.
All entries are reviewed by a staff member within 24
hours, Swapceinski said, and about 5 percent are deleted
because they are irrelevant (the doctor is having an
affair), suspicious (the doctor had an open bottle of vodka
on his desk) or potentially libelous (the doctor touched me
inappropriately).
"We're not just out to 'out' the bad ones, but to point
out the good ones," he said. A "very positive or very
negative rating opens the floodgates," eliciting additional
reviews. Waiting time, he said, is a "huge issue" mentioned
often, as are statements such as the doctor "never made eye
contact and was out in 30 seconds."
But critics contend that such sites reveal little of
importance.
"The people least capable of judging quality of care are
patients," said District internist Nancy Falk, whose mostly
positive ratings are offset by those calling her curt and
intolerant of questions, descriptions she denies. "They
don't know what we know." Falk regards doctor rating sites
as just as dubious as "Best Doctors" compilations. In her
view, both amount to popularity contests.
Orthopedic surgeon Peter Lavine, president of the
Medical Society of the District of Columbia, agrees.
"Doctors aren't like dishwashers or trash compactors or
minivans," he said. Ratings sites "are not scientific, have
a very small sample size and often attract patients who have
an axe to grind."
Some doctors advocate an aggressive response. Retired
neurosurgeon Jeffrey Segal of Greensboro, N.C., is the
founder of Medical Justice, a company that for a fee
starting at $495 provides sample privacy agreements and
monitors online comments for its 2,000 members. He said the
agreements enable doctors to ask Web sites to remove
comments by patients who have signed privacy agreements, and
to take legal action against patients.
Doctors, Segal said, need to take steps to safeguard
their reputations because of the Internet's "Wild West
atmosphere" and because physicians are bound by privacy laws
and can't defend themselves against spurious online
allegations.
"We've learned how hard it is to protect and preserve
doctors' reputations," Segal said. He cited a 2007
California appellate court decision that upheld the right of
a patient to operate Myplasticsurgerynightmare.com, a Web
site her surgeon tried to shut down.
"We're not opposed to free speech," Segal said. "We're
trying to smooth out the extremes." Some sites have removed
comments as a result of privacy agreements, Medical Justice
officials say, but they did not provide specific examples.
Assessing Ambiance
Arthur Levin, director of New York's Center for Medical
Consumers, a patient advocacy group, and Arthur Caplan,
director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of
Pennsylvania, are strongly opposed to gag orders. Caplan
echoes many legal experts, calling them "illegal,
unenforceable and silly." But the two disagree about the
value of ratings sites.
Levin said he believes they can provide information
sought by consumers, such as whether others think a doctor
communicates well. Caplan thinks they are merely "a measure
of ambiance" and don't reveal the most important
information: outcomes.
"One person's brusque is another's direct," Caplan said.
"It's notorious that many doctors who would score well on
ambiance are not good doctors, but manage to stay in
practice." As a member of the New York state medical
licensing board, "I saw again and again doctors who were
well beyond the border of malpractice who kept going because
patients loved them."
"Not only can't patients judge doctors, other doctors
can't judge doctors," Caplan added. Without knowing a
doctor's mortality, complication and infection rates,
rankings reveal "just a piece" of the data consumers
require.
Levin agrees that outcomes data are badly needed, but he
thinks ratings sites can be useful. "What you need to look
for is consistency and a certain number of ratings," he
said. "It's one piece of a total picture
Beth Nash, an internist employed by Consumer Reports,
advises that patients dump a doctor who demands a privacy
waiver. "While we have all had bad days," she wrote on the
group's health blog, "I find it hard to believe that a
doctor with multiple negative reviews has just been unlucky
enough to be judged on those occasional bad days."
Whose Privacy?
Northern Virginia OB-GYN Nicolae Filipescu has 35
reviews on RateMDs, far more than many of his peers. He also
has one review on Angie's List and five on Yelp, both posted
in the past six months. One Yelp poster described him as
"competent and professional," while the other said he was
rude, kept her waiting 90 minutes and offered to perform
cosmetic surgery on her nose.
The RateMD reviewers are similarly divided about
Filipescu. One called him "the best" and said he delivered
her three healthy children, while another advised, "Run as
fast as you can." Several accused him of insensitivity and
of telling patients, some of them pregnant, that they were
getting fat. One said he ridiculed her when she told him she
had fibromyalgia.
Filipescu, who has offices in Arlington and McLean,
disputes the negative reviews. "I said, 'Please do not get
fat,' " he said. Lengthy waits, he said, are not routine but
may occur because of an emergency. And while he performs
cosmetic surgery, Filipescu said he doesn't do nose jobs.
"You have to realize there are some people who are
somewhat disturbed," he said. "I don't get complaints from
the Medical Society of Virginia or the [state] medical
board."
But Filipescu opposes privacy agreements. "It's a
freedom-of-speech issue," he said. "Let them say what they
want."
Denver plastic surgeon Nicholas Slenkovich couldn't
disagree more. A member of Medical Justice, he regards the
waivers as "self-preservation" from what he terms "garbage"
on ratings Web sites that he says are riddled with factual
errors.
"Perception is very important in my business," said
Slenkovich, adding that he worries about being trashed by a
jealous competitor or a disgruntled patient. "The Internet
is out there and everyone's using it. This is my livelihood,
and I have no ability to reply." So far, he said, none of
his patients has refused to sign.
Although many doctors are unenthused about online
ratings, Falk, the District internist, said she would
support a different kind of site.
"I'd love to have a Web site where I could complain
about patients," she said. "All doctors would."
Copyright 2009 Washington Post.
Health
insurance tips for young adults
The Associated Press
Washington Post
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Get it while you're healthy. Experts say healthy young
adults can buy insurance at reasonable rates - and they
should.
It's tougher if you have a medical condition. Some
insurance companies have denied coverage for something as
simple as an allergy, says Sandy Praeger. She's past
president of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners and is the current insurance commissioner for
Kansas.
Signs posted on telephone poles aren't a good source for
insurance, Praeger warns. Anything that says you must "Act
now!" or promises health care at discounted rates should
raise suspicions.
Other tips:
-Know your insurance status. Are you still covered under
a parent's policy? When will that coverage end?
-If you're working and your employer offers a health
plan, think twice before turning it down to save money. How
would you pay the hospital bill if you had an accident?
-If you're not working or your employer doesn't offer
health benefits, ask an insurance agent about month-to-month
gap coverage or high-deductible policies that cover only
very serious health costs but have lower monthly rates.
-Read the fine print. Better yet, ask an insurance agent
to help you compare policies.
-Some insurers have plans designed for young adults with
high deductibles and low monthly premiums. For example,
WellPoint offers Tonik,http://www.tonikhealth.com, in six
states from $70 a month to $122 a month. Aetna offers
BodyGuard in Illinois from $40 a month to
$110,http://www.aetnabodyguard.com.
-The Web sitehttp://www.eHealthInsurance.comoffers free
price quotes based on region, age and other factors.
-If you're laid off, find out about federal subsidies
for COBRA premiums from your employer's benefits manager.
-Some states have their own COBRA laws that cover young
adults who are nearing the age of being dropped from their
parents' policies.
-More than 20 states allow you to stay on your parent's
plan through your mid-20s. The laws don't apply to all types
of employers though.
-If you are uninsured and have health problems, ask your
state insurance commissioner's office about high-risk pools.
-The National Association of Insurance Commissioners
offers more tips athttp://www.insureUonline.org.
Source: National Association of Insurance
Commissioners, WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc.
© 2009 The Associated Press.
The Do-It-Yourself
Funeral
The New Old Age - Caring and Coping
By The New York Times
New York Times
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Cheryl Senter for The New York Times Chuck Lakin
assembling a pine coffin in April on his home workbench in
Waterville, Me.
In a recent post on funeral expenses, reporter Sarah
Arnquist noted that many families are choosing to bypass the
funeral home altogether: “In all but six states, family
members are not legally required to consult a funeral
director at all. Home funerals are therefore a legal and
less expensive — but nearly forgotten — option.” Several of
you asked for more information.
Today The Times published an interesting article on the
trend, “Home Burials Offering an Intimate Alternative, at a
Lower Cost.” The number of home funerals has soared,
advocate (and coffin builder) Chuck Lakin told reporter
Katie Zezima, putting them “where home births were 30 years
ago.” Ms. Zezima adds:
The cost savings can be substantial, all the more
important in an economic downturn. The average American
funeral costs about $6,000 for the services of a funeral
home, in addition to the costs of cremation or burial. A
home funeral can be as inexpensive as the cost of pine for a
coffin (for a backyard burial) or a few hundred dollars for
cremation or several hundred dollars for cemetery costs.
New York, however, is one of those states requiring that
a funeral director handle the body.
Read Ms. Zezima’s article and Ms. Arnquist’s post. What
do you think of this trend? Have you too found the mortuary
experience inadequate in some way? Share your thoughts in
the comments section.
Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company.
Free clinics hit with more patients, less funding
Associated Press
Daily Record
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
DANBURY, Conn. — Health insurance and doctors were
unthinkable luxuries for George Anderson of Redding, laid
off nearly a year ago when his book distribution company
filed for bankruptcy.
Like countless others stripped of health insurance
because of the recession, Anderson and his family were
forced to turn to a free health clinic. In all, about 4
million Americans are expected to visit the nation's 1,200
free health clinics this year — a surge that comes as
clinics face a drop-off in financial support.
"Over the last year, free clinics have seen patient load
increase by 40 to 50 percent," said Nicole D. Lamoureux,
executive director of the National Association of Free
Clinics. "People who just last year had health coverage are
now out of work and need to have their health care needs
met."
For Anderson, 48, who had high blood pressure, and his
wife, who contracted pneumonia, the free clinic was a
necessity.
"We felt like we were teetering on the edge of a cliff
with all the other bills we had to pay for and if we had to
pay those hospital bills too, that would have tipped us
over," said Anderson, who has since found another job.
Groups like the CIGNA Foundation, which funds clinics in
Philadelphia and southwestern Connecticut, say they're
spending less on clinics even as funding requests have
jumped by 50 percent in the last year.
"Our spending is down by 15-20 percent since last year,"
spokeswoman Gloria Verrone said. "We've decided not to
eliminate working with organizations that need our help, but
we have had to decrease funding amounts in order to keep
those relationships. We also haven't been able to accept any
new groups this year but we're hopeful to start doing so
again by next year."
In Connecticut, Stamford-based Americares, an
international nonprofit relief group, operates three free
clinics in Danbury, Bridgeport and Norwalk. Officials have
seen patient visits increase 20 percent at the clinics this
year, said Karen Gottlieb, executive director of AmeriCares
Free Clinics.
The Danbury clinic, AmeriCares' busiest, has about 350
patient visits a month. Danbury had 3,000 unique and repeat
patients visits last year, Norwalk had a little over 2,700
and Bridgeport saw 1,600 patient visits.
Gottlieb predicts the patient volume from all three
clinics could reach around 8,000 by the end of the year.
The clinics, which accept walk-ins and appointments,
provide physicals, lab and diagnostic testing and specialty
care in cardiology, diabetes and other areas, all free of
charge. Patients must have a photo ID, proof of income and
cannot have medical insurance.
The three clinics have 350 volunteer physicians,
registered nurses and Spanish and Portuguese translators to
help aid patients, Gottlieb said.
She also mentioned that they have seen 79 new volunteers
so far this year, which is up from 48 during the same time
last year.
In cases where patients need treatment beyond what the
clinics can provide, they can be transferred to a local
hospital for free care courtesy of the hospital, said
Gottlieb.
"The point of the clinics is to provide health care to
people who fall through the cracks," she said. "People who
have Medicaid and are uninsured have the ability to go to
federally funded community health centers, but they charge
on a sliding scale. So we take the patients who don't have
the money to pay."
The clinics receive as much as $17,000 per year from the
cities where they are located, but are funded primarily with
donations coming from private foundations, corporations and
local church and civic groups. The Danbury clinic is also
helped by a partnership with Ridgefield-based Boehringer
Ingelheim, a pharmaceutical company, that gives medication
and medical products.
Gottlieb acknowledges, however, that not everything has
been on the upswing.
"We're busier than ever at a time when donations are
down," she said. "People are not giving what they used to
give."
Services provided by the clinics are lifesaving,
patients say.
Clarke Barre, 62, from Danbury, said he had a problem
going to a free clinic; he never would have guessed that he
would need such services.
"I am currently an uninsured person who has always been
employed and always been insured, but recent events have
changed that," he said.
Without a job and medical insurance, Barre said he did a
Google search for free clinics in his area and sought out
the Danbury clinic to get tested for discomfort.
Blood tests revealed that he had prostate cancer.
Barre said he would not have been able to pay for his
treatments without the help of a free clinic.
"I haven't had to pay a nickel," he said. "My
understanding is that we are in the tens of thousands at
this point.
"I might not be alive if it wasn't for clinics such as
these."
Copyright 2009 Daily Record.
S.C. case looks on child obesity as child abuse. But is it?
By Ron Barnett
USA Today
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Jerri Gray was doing all she could to help her son lose
weight, her attorney says. But something had gone terribly
wrong for the boy to hit the 555-pound mark by age 14.
Authorities in South Carolina say that what went wrong
was Gray's care and feeding of her son, Alexander Draper.
Gray, 49, of Travelers Rest, S.C., was arrested in June and
charged with criminal neglect. Alexander is now in foster
care.
The case has attracted national attention. With
childhood obesity on the rise across the USA, according to
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Gray's
attorney says it could open the door to more criminal action
against parents whose children have become dangerously
overweight.
"If she's found guilty on those criminal charges, you
have set a precedent that opens Pandora's box," Grant Varner
says. "Where do you go next?"
State courts in Texas, Pennsylvania, New York, New
Mexico, Indiana and California have grappled with the
question in recent years, according to a 2008 report
published by the Child Welfare League of America.
In all of those cases, except the one in California,
courts expanded their state's legal definition of medical
neglect to include morbid obesity and ruled that the
children were victims of neglect, the report says. Criminal
charges were filed only in the California and Indiana cases,
but the parents weren't sentenced to jail time in either.
What the court can order
The New York case in 2007 involved an adolescent girl
who weighed 261 pounds, the report says. The court ordered
nutritional counseling, cooking classes and gym workouts.
Criminal charges should be a last resort, says Linda
Spears, vice president of policy and public affairs for the
Child Welfare League of America.
"I think I would draw the line at a place where there
are serious health consequences for the child and efforts to
work with the family have repeatedly failed," she says.
What's more often needed is a structured plan of action
that's accountable to a court, she says.
Most of the time, the health problems tied to childhood
obesity don't become chronic until adulthood, which makes it
difficult to charge parents with child abuse, Spears says.
In the South Carolina case, Gray followed nutritional
guidelines set for her son by the state Department of Social
Services, Varner says, but Alexander apparently got other
food on his own while not under his mother's supervision.
The boy has been placed in foster care, and Varner says
he hasn't been allowed to speak to him. Gray has signed an
agreement with a film documentary company for exclusive
rights to her story and couldn't comment for this article,
Varner says.
"There's a strong likelihood that this kid is going to
school and could eat whatever he wanted to at school,
because you've got friends who will help him buy food or
will give him their leftovers," Varner says. "The big
question is: What is this kid doing when he's not in Mom's
care, custody and control?"
Greenville County School District spokesman Oby Lyles
declined to comment.
"This is not a case of a mother force-feeding a child,"
Varner says. "If she had been holding him down and
force-feeding him, sure, I can understand. But she doesn't
have the means to do it. She doesn't have the money to buy
the food to do it."
Slippery slope ahead?
The case could have ramifications beyond parental
control over obesity to other eating disorders, and even
other behaviors not related to weight, Varner says.
"What about the parents of every 16-year-old in Beverly
Hills who's too thin? Are they going to start arresting
parents because their child is too thin?" he asks.
Jolene Puffer, a personal trainer in Asheville, N.C.,
says the problem often is parents "loving their kids to
death," especially in low-income families where food is one
of the few things they can afford to give their children.
But school officials and doctors are "not sounding the
alarm" when they should, she says.
Puffer took a local family on as a volunteer project and
helped a 16-year-old boy who weighed 434 pounds lose 110
pounds, while his mother lost more than 80 and his sister
shed nearly 50.
A social services counselor had recommended that the boy
apply for Medicare, which Puffer says could have set him up
as a lifelong disability case.
States have been taking steps to combat childhood
obesity, according to a report released this month by the
Trust for America's Health and the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation.
For example, 20 states have passed requirements for
schools to do body mass index (BMI) screenings or other
weight-related tests of children and adolescents, up from
four states five years ago, says the report, title "F as in
Fat: How Obesity Policies are Failing in America."
But it also says that, although every state requires
physical education in schools, the requirements "are often
limited, not enforced, or do not meet adequate quality
standards."
The same report says 30% of children in 30 states ages
10 to 17 are overweight or obese, with the rate hitting a
high of 44.4% in Mississippi.
The CDC says the number of obese children ages 6 to 11
more than doubled in the past 20 years, while the rate for
adolescents more than tripled.
A comparison to drugs
Ron Jones, a corporate wellness expert based in Atlanta
and Los Angeles, uses the phrase "child obesity is child
abuse" in his promotional materials and says the nation has
turned its head the other way when it comes to accepting
that concept.
"If you gave your child a drug, you'd be held in the
court. But if you kill them with food, that seems to be
acceptable," he says.
The difficulty with prosecuting such cases is that most
state laws require that the child's health be in imminent
danger for criminal charges to be filed, and the parent must
be capable of helping the child but hasn't taken the
necessary action, says Richard Balnave, a professor at the
University of Virginia School of Law.
Obesity, although potentially dangerous, does not
generally put a child in imminent danger, he says.
Supreme Court rulings have recognized the right of
parents to raise their children how they see fit, Balnave
says, but not to the point that the child's health is
endangered.
The arrest warrant in the Gray case alleges that her
son's weight was "serious and threatening to his health" and
that she had placed him "at an unreasonable risk of harm."
Virginia Williamson, counsel for the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, says her agency sought
custody of Alexander "because of information from health
care providers that he was at risk of serious harm because
his mother was not meeting his medical needs."
The department "would not take action based on a child's
weight alone," she says.
Gray failed to appear at a family court hearing in which
her child was to be turned over to foster care, according to
a warrant issued in May.
Police later found her with the boy in Baltimore County,
Md., and took her back to South Carolina, where she was
released on a $50,000 bond, her attorney says.
TOP TREATS
Top snacks consumed by children under 6:
In 1987
In 2007
1. Cookies
Fruit
2. Fruit
Cookies
3. Milk
Milk
4. Juice
Crackers
5. Candy
Juice
6. Carbonated soft drinks Popcorn
7. Ice cream
Candy
8. Crackers Ice
cream
9. Cake
Chips
10. Chips
Fruit rolls/bars/pieces
Change of taste
The five foods/beverages that have increased the most in
the snack diet of young children today compared with young
children 20 years ago:
1. Fruit rolls/bars/pieces
2. Yogurt
3. Crackers
4. Bars
5. Bottled water
The five foods/beverages that have decreased the most in
the snack diet of young children today compared with young
children 20 years ago:
1. Carbonated soft drinks
2. Ice cream
3. Candy
4. Cake
5. Fruit juice
Source: NPD Group
Barnett reports for The Greenville (S.C.)
Copyright 2009 USA Today.
Opinion
---
BACK TO TOP
|
-
|
-
|