[newsclippings/dhmh_header.htm]
Visitors to Date

Office of Public Relations

 
 
 
DHMH Daily News Clippings
Saturday, May 16, 2009

 

Maryland / Regional
State Center could add to Maryland debt limit (Baltimore Sun)
Shortfall in taxes means more cuts (Baltimore Sun)
$18.9 million awarded for stem cell research in Md. (Baltimore Sun)
 
National / International
--
 
Opinion
Public-financed health care a must (Baltimore Sun Letter to the Editor)
 

 
Maryland / Regional
 
State Center could add to Maryland debt limit
Maryland treasurer issues warning about $1.4 billion development, but backers say complex would be economic stimulus for Baltimore
 
By Laura Smitherman and Lorraine Mirabella
Baltimore Sun
Saturday, May 16, 2009
 
Maryland's treasurer warned Friday that a planned $1.4 billion development anchored by the state office complex in Midtown Baltimore may count toward the state's debt limit, raising questions about the state's ability to afford the huge undertaking.
 
State officials also announced separately Friday a new lead developer to replace Struever Bros. Eccles & Rouse, which has struggled with mounting debt, and reiterated a goal to break ground on the State Center in 2010.
 
The development has become a politically charged topic in Annapolis, where lawmakers are seeking more information about the state's financial obligations, while Baltimore politicians and community members say the project would revitalize the area. The state's budget has been hit hard by the recession, and Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp's report indicated that the project could cause the state to exceed its debt limit within 10 years.
 
Lawmakers on budget committees have until the end of the month to weigh in before the project planners seek approval of the master development agreement from the state Board of Public Works, which has purview over state contracts and includes Kopp, Gov. Martin O'Malley and Comptroller Peter Franchot.
 
"Lawmakers have a lot of questions about the structure of this, how it would work and what the risk to the state is versus what the rewards would be," said Del. Murray D. Levy, a Charles County Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. "We don't have any money right now. The timing of this is difficult."
 
The mixed-used development around the state's 28-acre office complex, which holds the largest concentration of state workers in Maryland, has been hailed as a model for urban renewal that would include commercial and residential space near a number of major public transit hubs. The project also could create 8,000 jobs and generate nearly $60 million in annual tax revenue for city and state coffers.
 
"We see this whole project as an economic stimulus when this economy really needs this kind of private investment," said Michael A. Gaines, a project manager at the Maryland Department of General Services, which is working closely with the Department of Transportation to push ahead with the State Center plan.
 
Gaines said more than 60 percent of the project's capital costs would be borne by private developers, and that the state has time to back out of the deal. But several lawmakers question if it's a good deal.
 
"If we think we're going to go into a long depression, it would be kind of stupid to do such a development," said Sen. David R. Brinkley, a Frederick County Republican.
 
Kopp's office was careful not to judge the merits of the project and instead addressed the narrow issue of whether the state's occupancy leases should be considered "capital leases," and thus count toward the limit on how much can be borrowed for schools, prisons and other projects. The report said it would be "prudent" to consider them capital leases.
 
Struever Bros. will remain as a consultant on the project. The new developers, PS Partners LLC, include Linden Associates, headed by Baltimore developer Christopher Kurz, and Ekistics Capital Partners LLC, founded by Caroline Moore, who recently left Struever, where she had been project manager for the State Center.
 
The project's original minority partner, Doracon Development, withdrew earlier this year to focus on internal issues, Moore said. Its owner, Ronald H. Lipscomb, was indicted in January on charges related to an alleged bribery scheme involving City Councilwoman Helen L. Holton.
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
Shortfall in taxes means more cuts
Agencies asked to find three state programs to slash
 
By Julie Bykowicz
Baltimore Sun
Saturday, May 16, 2009
 
Maryland agencies that have already undergone several rounds of belt-tightening will have to get even leaner.
 
State Budget Secretary T. Eloise Foster distributed a memo Friday asking department heads to take another look at next year's budget with an eye toward more program cuts. The memo was prompted by this week's announcement that, amid a national economic downturn, revenues through the end of April fell $200 million short of what the state anticipated.
 
Agency leaders - from Public Safety to Human Resources to Environment - have until June 5 to "itemize and discuss ... reduction proposals" and single out three programs each that "do not deliver critical services." Unlike a request last fall to reduce spending by 5 percent, there's no target number - yet.
 
"At this point, it's a conceptual task," said Shaun Adamec, a spokesman for Gov. Martin O'Malley. "This is Round One. They know they need to come to the table with something."
 
Foster's memo asks agencies to consider "curtailing or limiting programs and activities that do not directly impact critical services for Maryland families during these difficult economic times." It also recommends "partnering with sister agencies to reduce costs" and rebidding contracts.
 
State lawmakers spent months agonizing over the 2010 operating budget, which at $14 billion represented less spending than this year, but fiscal policy analysts warned that a continued recession could mean more trouble for Maryland's coffers.
 
This week's state write-downs came about in part because of decreased income tax revenue. Comptroller Peter Franchot called the figures "ugly" and said he is troubled by a decline in individual income taxes, which dropped more than 17 percent last month compared to the year before.
 
Maryland law requires the state to balance its budget, so plummeting revenues mean another squeeze in state programs. After the agencies make their next reductions, which must be approved by the Board of Public Works, O'Malley will have reduced state spending by $3.7 billion and state positions by at least 2,700 since taking office in 2006, according to Foster's memo.
 
State hiring has been frozen for more than a year, although the overburdened Department of Human Resources recently received the governor's approval to fill 66 vacancies in the division that handles food and medical assistance requests.
 
"There's no illusion that this is a pleasant process," Adamec said.
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
$18.9 million awarded for stem cell research in Md.
 
By Gus G. Sentementes
Baltimore Sun
Saturday, May 16, 2009
 
WASHINGTON — - The Maryland Technology Development Corp. awarded $18.9 million this week to dozens of researchers involved in stem cell research at private and public institutions across the state. The state has been formally funding stem cell research since legislators passed the Maryland Stem Cell Research Act of 2006. Stem cell research is widely regarded as having the potential to deliver groundbreaking cures to a broad range of health problems and help fuel the state's efforts to become a hub for the biotechnology industry. Fifty-nine projects received funding in the latest round of awards. The researchers work at numerous public and private organizations across Maryland, including the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Maryland, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger and GlobalStem.
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

 
National / International
---
 

 
Opinion
 
Public-financed health care a must
 
Baltimore Sun Letter to the Editor
Saturday, May 16, 2009
 
I am writing to express my dismay about the health care reform process as it is currently being orchestrated.
 
Every other industrialized democracy in the world guarantees universal coverage through a publicly financed system. For the U.S. to think it can accomplish the same without a strong public system as a central tenet is folly.
 
The evidence that our for-profit system is more costly than publicly funded systems is overwhelming. Will someone please explain to me what the thinking is behind this?
 
Jan Caughlan, Baltimore
 
Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun.

BACK TO TOP

 

 
 
 

[newsclippings/dhmh_footer.htm]