• English
    X

    Google Translate Disclaimer

    The Maryland Department of Information Technology (“DoIT”) offers translations of the content through Google Translate. Because Google Translate is an external website, DoIT does not control the quality or accuracy of translated content. All DoIT content is filtered through Google Translate which may result in unexpected and unpredictable degradation of portions of text, images and the general appearance on translated pages. Google Translate may maintain unique privacy and use policies. These policies are not controlled by DoIT and are not associated with DoIT’s privacy and use policies. After selecting a translation option, users will be notified that they are leaving DoIT’s website. Users should consult the original English content on DoIT’s website if there are any questions about the translated content.

    DoIT uses Google Translate to provide language translations of its content. Google Translate is a free, automated service that relies on data and technology to provide its translations. The Google Translate feature is provided for informational purposes only. Translations cannot be guaranteed as exact or without the inclusion of incorrect or inappropriate language. Google Translate is a third-party service and site users will be leaving DoIT to utilize translated content. As such, DoIT does not guarantee and does not accept responsibility for, the accuracy, reliability, or performance of this service nor the limitations provided by this service, such as the inability to translate specific files like PDFs and graphics (e.g. .jpgs, .gifs, etc.).

    DoIT provides Google Translate as an online tool for its users, but DoIT does not directly endorse the website or imply that it is the only solution available to users. All site visitors may choose to use alternate tools for their translation needs. Any individuals or parties that use DoIT content in translated form, whether by Google Translate or by any other translation services, do so at their own risk. DoIT is not liable for any loss or damages arising out of, or issues related to, the use of or reliance on translated content. DoIT assumes no liability for any site visitor’s activities in connection with use of the Google Translate functionality or content.

    The Google Translate service is a means by which DoIT offers translations of content and is meant solely for the convenience of non-English speaking users of the website. The translated content is provided directly and dynamically by Google; DoIT has no direct control over the translated content as it appears using this tool. Therefore, in all contexts, the English content, as directly provided by DoIT is to be held authoritative.

    PROPOSAL
    Maryland Register
    Issue Date:  May 27, 2016
    Volume 43• Issue 11• Pages 638—639
     
    Title 10
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
    Subtitle 47 ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE ADMINISTRATION
    10.47.06 Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes Partnerships — (S.T.O.P.) Fund
    Authority: Health-General Article, §§8-6C-01—8-6C-04, Annotated Code of Maryland
    Notice of Proposed Action
    [16-124-P]
    The Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene proposes to amend Regulations .02—.04 under COMAR 10.47.06 Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes Partnerships (S.T.O.P.) Fund.
    Statement of Purpose
    The purpose of this action is to:
    (1) Modify the meaning of eligible populations;
    (2) Modify applicant requirements for funding;
    (3) Repeal task force requirement;
    (4) Define eligible functions; and
    (5) Clarify when funds may be continued or expanded for eligible functions.
    Comparison to Federal Standards
    There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
    Estimate of Economic Impact
    I. Summary of Economic Impact. There is no economic impact to the State as the amendments can be implemented within existing Departmental resources. The regulations expand the uses of the S.T.O.P. funds without requiring additional expenditures. In addition, because it is unknown whether counties with existing programs will request supplemental funding, the impact on them is unknown.
     
     
    Revenue (R+/R-)
     
    II. Types of Economic Impact.
    Expenditure (E+/E-)
    Magnitude
     

     
    A. On issuing agency:
    (E+)
    Indeterminable
    B. On other State agencies:
    NONE
    C. On local governments:
    (R+)
    Indeterminable
     
     
    Benefit (+)
    Cost (-)
    Magnitude
     

     
    D. On regulated industries or trade groups:
    (+)
    Indeterminable
    E. On other industries or trade groups:
    NONE
    F. Direct and indirect effects on public:
    NONE
    III. Assumptions. (Identified by Impact Letter and Number from Section II.)
    A., C., and D. S.T.O.P. Fund grants are 50/50 matching grants. A county or Baltimore City may expend additional monies in order to receive grant revenue from the State. If participating county or Baltimore City began using the funds after October 1, 2010, they may be eligible for STOP funding for newly eligible functions. Revenues from S.T.O.P. funds may increase significantly for newly eligible functions.
    Economic Impact on Small Businesses
    The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small businesses.
    Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
    The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
    Opportunity for Public Comment
    Comments may be sent to Michele Phinney, Director, Office of Regulation and Policy Coordination, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 201 West Preston Street, Room 512, Baltimore, MD 21201, or call 410-767-6499 (TTY 800-735-2258), or email to dhmh.regs@maryland.gov, or fax to 410-767-6483. Comments will be accepted through June 27, 2016. A public hearing has not been scheduled.
    .02 Definitions.
    A. (text unchanged)
    B. Terms Defined.
    (1) (text unchanged)
    (2) Eligible functions” means:
    (a) Transportation to and from treatment services;
    (b) Treatment, prevention, or coordination staff;
    (c) Data sharing services among counties and other appropriate treatment providers;
    (d) Education or outreach programs and materials;
    (e) In-community emergency behavioral health services or crisis stabilization units; or
    (f) Behavioral health programs in schools.
    [(2)] (3) “Eligible population” means:
    (a)—(k) (text unchanged)
    (l) The general inmate population within county-managed correctional facilities; [or]
    (m) Parents of children entering out-of-home placements or at risk of entering out-of-home placements; or
    (n) Drug offenders under the supervision of the problem solving courts.
    [(3)] (4)[(5)] (6) (text unchanged)
    [(6)] (7) “Request for partnership funding” means [a]:
    (a) A proposal, submitted by the governing bodies of one or more jurisdictions, to provide [substance abuse] substance-related disorder treatment services to one or more eligible populations; or
    (b) To provide funding for eligible functions within the requesting jurisdiction or jurisdictions.
    [(7)] (8) (text unchanged)
    .03 Requests for Partnership Funding and Criteria for Awarding Funding.
    A. (text unchanged)
    B. Proposals shall include the following:
    (1) (text unchanged)
    (2) Eligible functions that will be funded under the plan;
    [(2)] (3) A description of the plan to provide [substance abuse] substance-related disorder services;
    [(3)] (4)[(8)] (9) (text unchanged)
    C. Time Line. Requests for partnership funding shall be received by the Department[:
    (1) By April 30, 2001 for State fiscal year (SFY) 2002;
    (2) By April 1, 2002 for SFY 2003;
    (3) By April 1, 2003 for SFY 2004; and
    (4) For all succeeding years,] by April 1 for the following fiscal year.
    D. The Department[, in consultation with the Task Force, shall determine the criteria for funding awards. In evaluating requests for partnership funding, the Department and the Task Force] shall consider the following:
    (1)—(3) (text unchanged)
    (4) How the proposal fits into a balanced approach to the State’s variety of [substance abuse] substance-related disorder needs and populations that serve different geographic areas of the State with partnership funding;
    (5) The extent to which the proposal is part of or consistent with a regional strategy for [substance abuse] substance-related disorder treatment programs affecting adjoining jurisdictions; and
    (6) (text unchanged)
    E. The Department may specify in a request for proposals the types of treatment services that are eligible for funding awards.
    .04 Fiscal Responsibility by Jurisdiction.
    A.—C. (text unchanged)
    D. A participating jurisdiction may use partnership funding to continue or expand funding for eligible functions if the participating jurisdiction began spending funds on eligible functions after October 1, 2010.
    VAN T. MITCHELL
    Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene